Author: Timothy J. Frohlick
Date: 13:47:19 05/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
Shredder doesn't even consider the insipid h3 move. Shredder 7.04 -AMD 1500Mhz 512 MB RAM 128 MB Hash 2b2rk1/Rp5p/3pPqpQ/2nP4/4pp2/8/P1RN1PPP/6K1 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Shredder 7.04: 1.Qxf8+ Kxf8 -+ (-2.68) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 1.Qxf8+ Kxf8 -+ (-2.43) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 1.Rxc5 dxc5 ³ (-0.63) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 1.Rxc5 dxc5 ² (0.34) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 1.Rxc5 dxc5 2.Nxe4 +- (3.89) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 1.Nc4 +- (4.82) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 1.Nc4 +- (4.82) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 1.Nc4 Bxe6 2.Nxd6 +- (4.31) Depth: 2/4 00:00:00 1.Nc4 Qa1+ 2.Rc1 Qxc1# -+ (-#2) Depth: 2/4 00:00:00 1.Nc4 Qa1+ 2.Rc1 Qxc1# -+ (-#2) Depth: 2/4 00:00:00 1.Qxf8+ Kxf8 2.Rxc5 -+ (-#2) Depth: 2/4 00:00:00 1.Qxf8+ Qxf8 2.Nc4 -+ (-2.24) Depth: 2/8 00:00:00 1.Rxc5 Qa1+ 2.Nf1 dxc5 µ (-0.72) Depth: 2/8 00:00:00 1.Rxc5 Qa1+ 2.Nf1 dxc5 = (0.25) Depth: 2/8 00:00:00 1.Rxc5 Qa1+ 2.Rc1 Qxc1+ 3.Nf1 ± (1.39) Depth: 2/8 00:00:00 1.f3 Bxe6 +- (1.79) Depth: 2/8 00:00:00 1.f3 Qd4+ 2.Kf1 +- (2.24) Depth: 2/8 00:00:00 1.f3 Qd4+ 2.Kh1 Qxd5 +- (2.48) Depth: 2/8 00:00:00 1.Rc4 Nxe6 +- (2.59) Depth: 2/8 00:00:00 1.Rc4 Bxe6 2.dxe6 Qxe6 +- (3.07) Depth: 2/8 00:00:00 1.Rc4 Bxe6 2.dxe6 Qxe6 +- (3.79) Depth: 2/8 00:00:00 1.Rc4 Qe5 2.Qg5 Qxg5 +- (3.54) Depth: 3/8 00:00:00 1.Rc4 Qe5 2.a4 Qxd5 +- (3.04) Depth: 3/8 00:00:00 1.Rc4 Qe5 2.f3 Qxd5 3.fxe4 Qxd2 +- (2.79) Depth: 3/8 00:00:00 1.Rc1 Qd4 2.Nc4 Qxd5 +- (2.83) Depth: 3/8 00:00:00 1.Rc1 Qe5 2.Nb3 Qxd5 3.Nxc5 dxc5 +- (2.89) Depth: 3/9 00:00:00 1.Nb3 Bxe6 2.dxe6 Nxb3 +- (2.95) Depth: 3/9 00:00:00 1.Nb3 Bd7 2.exd7 Nxd7 +- (3.58) Depth: 3/9 00:00:00 1.Nb3 Nxe6 2.dxe6 Qxe6 +- (4.34) Depth: 3/10 00:00:00 1.Nb3 Qe5 2.Qxh7+ Kxh7 3.Rxb7+ Bxb7 +- (4.09) Depth: 4/11 00:00:00 1.Nb3 Qe5 2.Qxh7+ Kxh7 3.Rxb7+ Bxb7 +- (3.59) Depth: 4/12 00:00:00 1.Nb3 Bd7 2.exd7 Qa1+ 3.Nxa1 +- (3.59) Depth: 4/12 00:00:00 1.Nb3 Qe5 2.Rd2 Nd3 3.Qg7+ Qxg7 +- (3.34) Depth: 5/12 00:00:00 1.Nb3 Qe5 2.Rc1 Qxd5 3.e7 b6 +- (3.34) Depth: 5/16 00:00:00 1.Nb3 Qe5 2.Rc1 Qxd5 3.e7 Re8 4.Nxc5 dxc5 +- (3.47) Depth: 6/17 00:00:01 47kN 1.Nb3 Qe5 2.Rc1 e3 3.fxe3 fxe3 4.Rxc5 dxc5 5.Qxg6+ hxg6 +- (3.22) Depth: 7/19 00:00:01 87kN 1.Nb3 Qe5 2.Rc1 e3 3.Nxc5 exf2+ 4.Kf1 Qh5 5.Qxh5 +- (3.22) Depth: 7/21 00:00:01 100kN 1.h4 Qe5 2.h5 Nxe6 3.dxe6 gxh5 +- (3.23) Depth: 7/24 00:00:01 175kN 1.h4 Qe5 2.h5 gxh5 3.Nc4 Qxd5 4.e7 +- (3.31) Depth: 7/24 00:00:01 188kN 1.h4 Qe5 2.h5 gxh5 3.Nc4 Qxd5 4.Qxf4 Rxf4 +- (3.06) Depth: 8/24 00:00:01 224kN 1.h4 Qe5 2.Qg5 Qa1+ 3.Nf1 Qb1 4.Rd2 f3 5.e7 +- (3.05) Depth: 8/24 00:00:01 290kN 1.h4 Qf5 2.Qg5 Bxe6 3.dxe6 Nxe6 4.Qxf5 Rf6 5.Qxf6 +- (3.26) Depth: 9/26 00:00:03 712kN 1.h4 Qe5 2.Qg5 Qa1+ 3.Nf1 f3 4.g3 Qd4 5.e7 Re8 6.Ne3 +- (3.08) Depth: 10/28 00:00:06 1737kN 1.h4 Qe5 2.h5 gxh5 3.Nc4 Qxd5 4.e7 Qd1+ 5.Kh2 Re8 6.Nxd6 Rxe7 7.Rxc5 Rg7 +- (3.33) Depth: 11/30 00:00:14 3819kN 1.h4 Qf5 2.Qg5 Bxe6 3.dxe6 Qxe6 4.Nc4 e3 5.Nxe3 fxe3 6.Qxe3 Qxe3 +- (3.33) Depth: 11/31 00:00:17 4918kN 1.h4 Qa1+ 2.Nf1 Qf6 3.Rc4 f3 4.g3 Qf5 5.Ne3 Qh3 6.Rb4 Bxe6 7.dxe6 Qxe6 +- (3.30) Depth: 12/34 00:00:32 8770kN 1.h4 Qa1+ 2.Nf1 Qf6 3.Qg5 Kg7 4.Nd2 Qa1+ 5.Kh2 Kg8 6.e7 Re8 7.Nc4 Qd1 8.Rc3 Na4 +- (3.33) Depth: 13/38 00:00:58 15847kN 1.h4 Qd4 2.e7 Re8 3.Qxf4 Bf5 4.g4 Nd3 5.Qe3 Qa1+ 6.Nf1 Bxg4 7.Rxb7 Nc5 8.Ra7 Qf6 9.Qg3 Bf3 +- (3.25) Depth: 14/44 00:02:25 40635kN (Frohlick, Albuquerque 12.05.2003) On May 12, 2003 at 15:09:08, Jorge Pichard wrote: >In the Second game Kasparov was very upset at the board soon after playing >(diagram) 25...Qa1+. He realized a few moves later that White could force him to >take a perpetual check draw with a surprising queen sacrifice. In the press >conference he said that he thought he had a forced win with the queen check, but >that in hindsight 25...f4 would have been stronger. > > >Junior co-programmer Amir Ban quotes someone from Kasparov's team as saying >afterwards that 25...f4 26.h3! was also a draw. We can't be sure yet what Junior >would have played. My DJ 7 wants to play 26.Nf1, which would allow black a very >strong attack after 26...e3. > > > >Fritz 8 and Chess Tiger 15 both changed from 26.h3! to h4?! is 26.h4?! a better >move here? > > >[D]2b2rk1/Rp5p/3pPqpQ/2nP4/4pp2/8/P1RN1PPP/6K1 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fritz 8: > >2.Ra3 > ± (1.13) Depth: 6/29 00:00:00 146kN >2.Qh3 e3 3.Nf1 exf2+ 4.Kh1 f3 5.Qxf3 Qxf3 > ± (1.16) Depth: 6/29 00:00:00 175kN > ± (1.38) Depth: 6/29 00:00:00 180kN >2.h3! > +- (1.41) Depth: 6/29 00:00:00 189kN >2.h4 Qa1+ 3.Nf1 Qe5 4.Qg5 Qd4 5.Ra8 Qg7 6.h5 gxh5 7.Qh4 b6 8.Nd2 > +- (1.44) Depth: 6/29 00:00:00 225kN > +- (1.94) Depth: 12/37 00:00:26 12830kN > > > >Analysis by Chess Tiger 15.0: > >1.h4 Qa1+ 2.Nf1 e3 3.e7 Re8 4.fxe3 Bf5 5.Rc4 Rxe7 6.exf4 > +- (3.50) Depth: 6 00:00:00 149kN > +- (2.76) Depth: 7 00:00:00 307kN >1.h3 Qf5 2.Rc4 Qxd5 3.e7 Re8 4.Qxf4 Rxe7 5.Ra8 Qe6 6.Rb8 > +- (2.90) Depth: 7 00:00:01 495kN > +- (2.30) Depth: 10 00:00:13 4399kN
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.