Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: 64 Bit Programs

Author: Eugene Nalimov

Date: 20:21:42 06/29/03

Go up one level in this thread

On June 29, 2003 at 23:00:29, Jay Urbanski wrote:

>On June 29, 2003 at 22:19:48, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>My point was not that it will be bad.  But that it _could_ be better.  Going
>>to 64 bits while supporting legacy X86 architecture stuff is not the way to
>>fastest performance.
>
>Bob you should see if Intel are hiring Itanium sales people :)
>
>I'm certainly happy to be able to run all my exisiting software faster than any
>other processor on the planet can run it.  And Opteron is currently the fastest
>shipping processor around for Integer performance, period.  Yeah Itanium II and
>Madison are faster in floating point - but they cost several thousand dollars a
>pop also.


SPECint 2K:

Opteron: 1095 (base) / 1170 (peak)
P4:      1164 (base) / 1200 (peak)

http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2003q2/cpu2000-20030421-02108.html
http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2003q2/cpu2000-20030422-02135.html

Thanks,
Eugene

• Re: 64 Bit Programs Sune Fischer 00:44:09 06/30/03
  • Re: 64 Bit Programs Roberto Nerici 01:38:37 07/01/03
• Re: 64 Bit Programs Jay Urbanski 20:33:12 06/29/03
  • Re: 64 Bit Programs Eugene Nalimov 10:05:31 07/01/03
    • Re: 64 Bit Programs Jay Urbanski 19:47:52 07/01/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.