Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:10:04 08/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 06, 2003 at 12:09:03, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On August 06, 2003 at 03:13:34, martin fierz wrote: > >Did you use PGO (profile guided optimizations) with gcc 3.2 ? > >If not, redo the test. it is here where GCC wins for me from all >other compilers at x86 hardware. It is _also_ there that GCC often crashes when trying to compile crafty. It is _not_ bug-free. (it = gcc) > >P3, K7 and p4. > >>On August 05, 2003 at 13:02:50, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>>On August 05, 2003 at 11:15:41, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On August 05, 2003 at 10:45:41, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >>>> >>>>>On August 05, 2003 at 09:53:26, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On August 05, 2003 at 09:24:07, ERIQ wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>No. >>>>> >>>>>I have to disagree. I have performed a number of experiments and found msvc >>>>>faster some of the time and gcc faster some of the time. It all depends on a >>>>>number of factors that are not completely predictable. >>>>> >>>>>The experiments consisted of simulataneously dropping CD copies of each compiler >>>>>from the roof of my home and observing which CD impacted the ground first. They >>>>>never seemed to impact the ground at exactly the same time, but there was no >>>>>clear favorite either. >>>> >>>> >>>>:) >>> >>>Joking aside, how much slower on average is gcc compared to msvc, and more >>>importantly what are the final results like between the two? >>> >>> Albert >> >>i once compiled my checkers program with both GCC 3.2 and MSVC7. the MSVC7 .exe >>was around 10% faster. >> >>cheers >> martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.