Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 18:23:13 10/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2003 at 20:09:55, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >On October 27, 2003 at 20:00:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On October 27, 2003 at 19:57:12, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >> >>>On October 27, 2003 at 19:24:10, Peter Skinner wrote: >>> >>>>On October 27, 2003 at 19:06:51, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>I don't think you should be afraid. 500 CPUs is not enough -- you need >>>>>reasonable good program to run on them. >>>>> >>>>>Thanks, >>>>>Eugene >>>> >>>>I would bet on Crafty with 500 processors. That is for sure. I know it is quite >>>>a capable program :) >>>> >>>>Peter. >>> >>>Efficiently utilizing 500 CPUs is *very* non-trivial task. I believe Bob can do >>>it, but it will be nor quick nor easy. >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Eugene >> >> >>If the NUMA stuff doesn't swamp me. And if your continual updates to the >>endgame tables doesn't swamp me. We _might_ see some progress here. :) >> >>If I can just figure out how to malloc() the hash tables reasonably on your >>NUMA platform, without wrecking everything, that will be a step... > >Ok, just call the memory allocation function exactly where you are calling it >now, and then let the user issue "mt" command before "hash" and "hashp" if (s)he >want good scaling. > >Thanks, >Eugene That's why i'm multiprocessing. All problems solved at once :)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.