Author: Jim Bodkins
Date: 01:33:50 11/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
I assume they would require cooperation and failing to get it they could act on that basis. But not on the basis of plagarism based upon speculation involving a different program. A point I made in my thread was that one of the ICGA's standards for identifying plagarism was similarity of playing style and that Dr. Hyatt stated that this was not an adequate standard for plagarism. I trust Dr. Hyatt. That means that there is a problem with either the ICGA's standards, the officials applying the standards or both. I tend not to trust a situation where there is an 'alledged' accuser that is unnamed. Although it isnt likely, it is possible that there is in fact no accuser at all and the ICGA is abusing it's authority. I doubt that is happening. But without either an OPEN process in which all parties are known along with the specifics of the accusations or rigorous oversight by an uninvolved third party, I just dont entirely trust it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.