Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 16:56:12 01/04/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2004 at 19:51:15, Peter Berger wrote: >On January 04, 2004 at 19:46:51, Ricardo Gibert wrote: > >>On January 04, 2004 at 17:44:08, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >> >>>On January 04, 2004 at 13:46:48, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >>> >>>>On January 04, 2004 at 12:47:25, Peter Berger wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 04, 2004 at 12:40:00, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 04, 2004 at 12:29:15, Mark Young wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>A score of 17 - 3 in a 20 game match has a certainty of over 99% that the winner >>>>>>>of the match is stronger then the loser. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>A 100 game match ending 55 - 45 only has a 81% chance that the winner of the >>>>>>>match is the stronger program. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>A 200 game match ending 106 - 94 only has a 78 % chance that the winner is >>>>>>>stronger then the loser. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Nothing you have said is really correct because you have ignored the significant >>>>>>effect of draws in a match. >>> >>>I think, I understand the issue you rise. However, 17-3 will be more significant >>>than the other results independent of draw. So, still some truth there. I really >>>wonder, how exactly Elostat calculates the +/- margins to the calculated rating. >>>Does anybody know an URL, where one can read this? >>> >>>>>The percentage of draws doesn't matter at all when it is about the conclusion >>>>>which program is strongest based on the above match results. >>>>> >>>>>This has been shown by Remi Coloum and explained in multiple posts >>>>>here(unfortunately the search engine hasn't found a new home yet). >>>>> >>>>>6-0 with 0 draws and 6-0 with 1000 draws has the exact same prediction value >>>>>when it is about the question which engine is stronger based on a match result. >>>> >>>>In this case, the number of decisive games (w+L=6) and margin of victory (w-L=6) >>>>is the same in both cases so the conclusion they have equal value is correct. >>>> >>>> ------------------------------- >>>> >>>>In the examples given before, the number of decisive games depends on the number >>>>of draws e.g. +17-3=0 and +14-0=6 are not of equal value since the number >>>>decisive games are not equal. >>> >>>Hey, I think Peter and Ricardo wanted to say exactly the same thing. Still they >>>succeeded to disagree. >> >>??? Not exactly the same thing at all. He said, "The percentage of draws doesn't >>matter at all when it is about the conclusion which program is strongest based >>on the above match results." This implies that +55-45=0 is the same as +10-0=90 >>and I completely disagree with this. >> > >Dieter wasn't that wrong. My answer was non-sequitur and worded in a superficial >way, which is a bad thing. Though you are right and my post made little sense I >didn't really disagree with you anyway. Okay, I understand what happened now. Thanks for clearing things up.
This page took 0.09 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.