Author: martin fierz
Date: 15:12:05 01/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2004 at 17:34:34, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On January 11, 2004 at 17:03:46, Tord Romstad wrote: > >>On January 11, 2004 at 16:45:16, martin fierz wrote: >> >>>On January 11, 2004 at 15:45:54, Tord Romstad wrote: >>> >>>>That's not bad at all! I haven't tested against Crafty for a long time, but I'm >>>>fairly sure >>>>Gothmog is at least 250 points behind Crafty on a single-processor 32 bit >>>>machine. >>> >>>hi tord, >>> >>>i'll bet you a beer that it's less than that! >> >>Hi Martin, >> >>I accept your bet, and I am willing to bet that the opposite is true. If some >>neutral person >>is willing to run a 100-game blitz match between Gothmog 0.4.5 and the most >>recent version >>of Crafty on a single-processor 32 bit machine, and Crafty scores less than 81 >>points, I'll >>buy you a beer if we ever meet. :-) >> >>If you ever come to Norway, please be warned that the beer is ridiculously >>expensive here. >> >>Tord > >A 40 games blitz match Gothmog 0.45-Crafty 19.06 (Dann Corbit) ended >16,5:23,5 (+12 =9 -19) > >Gothmog without tablebase support since it does not work if the tablebases are >located on a different harddisk. > >timecontrol 3 min without increment; AMD 1.6Ghz; CB-GUI; Fritz8.ctg book, both >engines have to play each position with black and white; 64 MB hash; 3,4,5 men >tablebases for Crafty > >In a second Blitz match on AMD 1.8 Ghz Gothmog has tablebase support. >The results are clearly worse nevertheless. > >18:8 in favour of Crafty 19.06; time control is 5 min + 3 sec > >Crafty 19.06 DC performed much better than Crafty 19.08 DC in Blitz on my >machines, so I will continue to use it. > >Michael hi michael, thanks for running the match. it's looking good for my beer ;-) cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.