Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 03:14:10 01/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2004 at 23:52:38, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 14, 2004 at 15:57:49, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >>On January 14, 2004 at 15:31:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On January 14, 2004 at 15:00:40, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >>> >>>>On January 14, 2004 at 14:46:39, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 14, 2004 at 14:21:27, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Kasparov - Anand (Linares 1994) >>>>>>[D]1rb1r1k1/2q1bp2/pp1pp1p1/2n3Pp/Pn2PP1Q/1NN1B2R/1PP3BP/R5K1 w - - 22.Bf3!! Bf8 >>>>>>23.Bxh5!! gxh5 24.Qxh5 Bg7 25.Bd4 e5 26.f5 exd4 27.Qh7+ Kf8 28.f6 Ne6 29.Qh8+ >>>>>>Bxh8 30.Rxh8 mate >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>26. ... exd4 is bad. Kf8 holds on much longer with only a score of >>>>>+1.something. exd4 leads to an instant mate in 4 for white... >>>> >>>>Sorry, i post the variation for humans and not for computers.But you have to >>>>agree that 22.Bg2-f3!! leads to a won position for white. >>>> >>>>So the question is how long will it take Crafty to find 22.Bf3 ? >>> >>>I dont know that it will. However, +1.0 is not a "won position" exactly, >>>although I would agree that it looks good for white... >>> >>>And whether there is something even better is yet another question.. >> >>There are really very funny people here in this forum. Come one guys, the white >>pieces had been moved by the best player of this planet and he had analyzed that >>game completly in NewInChess magazine 3/94. > >You need to first (a) turn down the rudeness; then (b) turn up the thought >process louder. > >What _I_ responded to was _not_ Kasparov's analysis. It was about the move >played in the game, that was an instant loss. 26. ... Kf8 does _not_ get >mated in the next 10-15 moves, while the game move got mated in 4 moves. > >Second, do you think Kasparov never makes mistakes? Did he not blunder in a >won and then in a drawing position against deep junior? Did he not resign in >a drawn position against DB? meat makes mistakes, whether it is Kasparov's >meat or mine. > >Back to the game. I responded to your suggested Bx move. It is _not_ >crushing yet... > >I would rather be white, but I would much rather be black after 26. ... Kf8 >than black after the move played in the game. > >BTW I _did_ give this some thought. I suspect you just blindly accept >any analysis by Kasparov as "absolute truth" with no thought whatsoever.. > >I didn't see anything "funny" at all, myself... > >But perhaps I won't respond next time you pose a question either? > >This thread _was_ started by a question about the plan starting with Bf3. > That´s the point.I am interested if a program find´s the best move in the givven position by a diagram (move 22), and you are discussing a position at move 26 which can´t help black to save the game because black is worse after 2..Bf3!! PS: The continuation in the game was 26...Nxe4. The move givven by me would like to show only the ideas behind this attack. This is normal practise in human chess. >> >>[Event "NIC 3/94"] >>[Site "Linares"] >>[Date "1994"] >>[Round "11"] >>[White "G. Kasparov"] >>[Black "V. Anand"] >>[ECO "B57"] >>[Result "1-0"] >> >>1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 d6 3. Nge2 Nc6 4. d4 cxd4 5. Nxd4 Nf6 >>6. Bc4 Qb6 7. Nb3 e6 8. Bf4 Ne5 9. Be2 Be7 10. Be3 Qc7 >>11. f4 Nc6 12. Bf3 a6 13. O-O O-O 14. a4 b6 15. g4 Rb8 >>16. g5 Nd7 17. Bg2 Re8 18. Rf3 Nc5 19. Rh3 g6 20. Qg4 Nb4 >>21. Qh4 h5 22. Bf3 Bf8 23. Bxh5 gxh5 24. Qxh5 Bg7 25. Bd4 >>e5 26. f5 Nxe4 27. Qh7+ Kf8 28. Nxe4 Bxf5 29. Qxf5 exd4 >>30. Nf6 Qxc2 31. Nxd4 Qxb2 32. Rd1 Re5 33. Nd7+ Ke7 >>34. Nxe5 Bxe5 35. Qe4 1-0
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.