Author: martin fierz
Date: 00:21:53 02/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 11, 2004 at 21:25:17, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >On February 11, 2004 at 17:16:00, GuyHaworth wrote: > >> >>When I was taught chess, pre-history now, the piece values were: >> >>Pawn = 1 (without loss of generality) >>Bishop = Knight = 3 >>Rook = 5 >>Queen = 10. >> >>These figures may not be 'current thinking' so feel free to correct me there. >> >> >>However, my question is this. If piece-values are assumed to be dependent only >>on the force on the board, what values should they be given for various forces >>in the endgame? >> >> >>g > >You won't find much discussion on eval at CCC. There are essentially 4 types of >people here: > >commercials: don't discuss eval because they value their jobs >amateurs: don't know anything about eval >chess players: have the knowledge, but don't know how to implement it >morons: why would you listen to them anyway > >anthony hi anthony, why don't we just close down CCC then? ;-) cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.