Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:45:14 02/28/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2004 at 06:28:58, Bryan Hofmann wrote: >On February 27, 2004 at 18:44:23, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 27, 2004 at 18:17:18, Bryan Hofmann wrote: >> >>>On February 27, 2004 at 18:11:39, Derek Paquette wrote: >>> >>>>Ok, I am a littel confused? >>>> >>>>These engines are code named so he doesn't know which engine he is playing >>>>exactly? or? >>>> >>>>what exactly is going on, >>> >>>Same here, but I do know this Nickel is not a GM level player OTB >>>http://www.fide.com/ratings/card.phtml?event=4623703 >> >>Totally unimportant. > >Your opion. > >> >>The games are to check if strong correspondence players with the aid of >>computers can beat computers. > >If this is a Cyborg match then the human part of the equation makes a big >difference as to his rating in OTB. The human is the one making the choice for >the move. > > >> >>Note that Arno nickel does not use many computers to analyze so the opponents >>computer opponent have time advanatage and to make the task harder arno nickel >>also does not know the names of the chess programs that he is playing so he >>cannot prepare against specific program unless he guess correctly the opponent. > >Makes no difference if it is 1 or 50 programs used to analyze the next move. The >bottom line is the human is making the choice thus his OTB skills are a >determining factor of the outcome. I think that some otb skills are irrelevant. Memory is important in otb games because it is illegal to make notes or to analyze in another board. It is not the case in correspondence games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.