Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:08:31 03/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 03, 2004 at 14:43:28, James Swafford wrote: >On March 03, 2004 at 14:17:18, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On March 02, 2004 at 15:19:51, Russell Reagan wrote: >> >>>On March 02, 2004 at 09:53:15, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >>> >>>>What about following slightly modified [Swiss system], a kind of "delayed" swiss >>>>system to keep the tension a bit longer? >>>> >>>>For the first (4-6) rounds playing swiss with two about equal strong groups with >>>>about (even) quantity and quality, eg. >>>>(1,4,5,8,9,12,13,16)<->(2,3,6,7,10,11,14,15) or similar. >>>> >>>>Then reunion both groups and continue with standard swiss, and there are still >>>>some thrilling rounds to go. >>> >>>>What do you think would be better? Standard 11 rounds Swiss (like in Graz WCCC), >>>>or the delayed Swiss as suggested by Gerd? >>> >>>With all of the controversy surrounding the Graz event, you may be better off >>>just aiming for an event that just runs smoothly, as opposed to trying to make >>>significant changes (unless there is a clear improvement where the downside is >>>very little to none). It seems like you are unsure whether the delayed swiss is >>>an improvement. If you're not sure, well...if something can go wrong, it will :) >> >> >>the quirk here is that they _know_ they are bleeding (too many rounds for last >>rounds to be interesting) but they persist in trying to decide on whether to use >> band-aid or gauze and tape to stop it. It would be far better to just solve >>the real problem with a long-term fix rather than a poor patch... >> >>otherwise the patient is going to die... > > >Or live on in agony... I suppose that when you consider the insane Shredder/Jonny decision, "agony" is certainly a reasonable word...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.