Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 11:46:46 03/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 05, 2004 at 14:42:04, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On March 05, 2004 at 14:30:38, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On March 05, 2004 at 12:30:43, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On March 05, 2004 at 10:29:16, Bob Durrett wrote: >>> >>>If you scroll back in CCC archives you will find GCP from Sjeng, who tried to >>>figure out why Sjeng was beated so much by CCC users. He substantiated his claim >>>that the UCI in fritz8 was putting back the hashtable from game 2 and further to >>>1MB for DeepSjeng. >>> >>>Is that enough for you, or do you need confirmation at the chessbase homepage? >> >>That has nothing to do with the SSDF and everything to do with ChessBase. >> >>If you have a bug in your program, is the SSDF responsible for that also? >> >>Of course, the SSDF will make mistakes, like any organization run by people. >> >>But the data produce by the SSDF is better than the data produced by any other >>chess ranking body, includig FIDE and the USCF. IMO-YMMV. > >The SSDF is not there to correct their mistakes. Majority of what they play is >not published, so we can *never* check the amount of mistakes made. The old games are lost. The new games are published. You can find them here: http://home.interact.se/~w100107/welcome.htm What games are missing that were played in the last year or so? >We only know 1 tester from SSDF is transparant. What do you mean? I do not understand that statement. I think Tony and Bertil do lots of posts in this forum, but maybe the others just don't post much online. And I do not think activity in this or other forums should have any connection to the quality of the data.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.