Author: Dan Ellwein
Date: 18:45:22 03/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 23, 2004 at 16:21:15, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On March 23, 2004 at 04:35:49, Tord Romstad wrote: > >>[D]k1r5/p5n1/1prp3p/5p2/P1PPp1pP/2P1P1P1/3KBP2/1R4B1 w - - >> >>This position occured in a blitz game on the ICC with Gothmog (white) against >>Arasan. Of course, as is immediately obvious to a human observer, white is >>dead lost. It's impossible to activate the bishop on g1, and white is >>effectively a rook down. >> >>To my disgust, Gothmog was quite happy about its position, and showed a small >>plus score. And because Arasan appeared to be equally clueless about the >>position, Gothmog even went on to win after a really ugly endgame. >> >>After the game, I decided to check Gothmog's static eval for the position. >>It thinks that white has an advantage(!) of 0.24 pawns. Of course it >>notices the bad mobility for the bishop on g1, but it doesn't understand >>that it will never be possible to activate the bishop without loss of >>material. >> >>How do other engines evaluate this position? >> >>Tord > > >Crafty likes black: >note: scores are for the white side >material evaluation................. -1.30 >development......................... 0.00 >pawn evaluation..................... -0.27 >passed pawn evaluation.............. 0.00 >passed pawn race evaluation......... 0.00 >king safety evaluation.............. 0.00 >interactive piece evaluation........ 0.63 >total evaluation.................... -0.94 CM9000 personality OffSet sees this position as a draw... P3/850 64M hash... Time Depth Score Positions Moves 0:00 1/5 -0.18 6603 1.Rb5 a6 2.Rb1 Ka7 3.Bh2 Ne6 0:00 1/6 -0.18 12612 1.Rb5 a6 2.Rb1 Ka7 3.Bh2 Ne6 0:00 1/6 -0.14 17959 1.Bh2 Re8 2.Rb5 a6 3.Rb1 Ka7 0:00 1/7 -0.23 53134 1.Bh2 Re8 2.Rb2 Rc7 3.Rb5 Kb8 4.Rd5 0:00 1/7 -0.20 64817 1.Rb3 Re8 2.c5 bxc5 3.Bb5 Rb6 4.dxc5 dxc5 5.Bxe8 Rxb3 0:01 1/8 -0.18 136588 1.Rb3 Rf8 2.Rb1 h5 3.Rb5 a6 4.Rb1 Ka7 0:02 1/8 -0.15 201173 1.Kc2 Rb8 2.Bh2 Rf8 3.Rb5 Kb8 4.Kd2 Rcc8 0:04 1/9 -0.13 390059 1.Kc2 Rb8 2.Ra1 Nh5 3.Rb1 Rc7 4.Rb5 Ng7 5.Rd5 0:07 1/10 -0.16 672636 1.Kc2 Rb8 2.Ra1 Rc7 3.a5 Rcb7 4.Bd1 bxa5 5.Rxa5 Rb2+ 6.Kc1 Rb1+ 7.Kd2 R8b2+ 8.Ke1 Rc2 0:09 1/10 -0.11 964540 1.Rb5 Rb8 2.Rd5 a6 3.a5 bxa5 4.Rxa5 Rb2+ 5.Ke1 Rb1+ 6.Bd1 Kb7 7.Rd5 Kc7 0:16 1/11 -0.16 1688952 1.Rb5 a6 2.Rd5 Rb8 3.Kc1 Ka7 4.c5 bxc5 5.dxc5 dxc5 6.Rd7+ Rb7 0:19 1/11 -0.11 2045600 1.Kc2 Rb8 2.Ra1 Rc7 3.a5 Rcb7 4.axb6 Rxb6 5.Ra2 Ne6 6.Kd2 Rb2+ 7.Rxb2 Rxb2+ 8.Ke1 0:34 1/12 -0.11 3638209 1.Kc2 Rb8 2.Rb2 h5 3.Ra2 Rbc8 4.a5 b5 5.c5 a6 6.c4 bxc4 7.Bxc4 dxc5 1:05 2/13 -0.09 7132334 1.Kc2 Rb8 2.Ra1 Rb7 3.a5 Nh5 4.Bh2 Kb8 5.d5 Rc8 6.axb6 Rxb6 7.Rb1 2:41 3/14 -0.11 17725685 1.Kc2 Rb8 2.Ra1 Rc7 3.a5 Rcb7 4.axb6 Rxb6 5.Bd1 R8b7 6.c5 dxc5 7.dxc5 Rc6 8.Rb1 Rxc5 9.Rxb7 Kxb7 7:20 4/15 -0.11 49767297 1.Kc2 Rb8 2.Ra1 a5 3.Bh2 Kb7 4.Rb1 Rf8 5.Rb5 Ne8 6.Kd2 Nc7 7.d5 Rc5 8.Rxc5 bxc5 20:59 5/16 -0.11 142848746 1.Kc2 Rb8 2.Ra1 a5 3.Bh2 Kb7 4.Rb1 Rf8 5.Rb5 Ne8 6.Kd2 Nc7 7.d5 Rc5 8.Rxc5 bxc5 35:00 5/16 -0.08 237522685 1.Rb5 a6 2.Rd5 Rb8 3.Bd1 Ka7 4.Bb3 Rb7 5.Ba2 h5 6.a5 bxa5 7.Rxa5 Rb2+ 8.Kc1 Rcb6 9.c5 dxc5 10.dxc5 56:04 6/17 -0.08 386782218 1.Rb5 a6 2.Rd5 Rb8 3.Bd1 Ka7 4.Bb3 Rb7 5.Ba2 h5 6.a5 bxa5 7.Rxa5 Rb2+ 8.Kc1 Rcb6 9.c5 dxc5 10.dxc5 2:47:09 7/18 -0.06 1158632406 1.Rb5 a6 2.Rd5 a5 3.Ke1 Kb7 4.Kf1 R8c7 5.Bd1 Rf7 6.Bb3 Rf6 7.Rb5 Rc8 8.c5 dxc5 9.Bd5+ Ka7 10.dxc5 7:39:09 8/19 -0.16 -1044052721 1.Rb5 a6 2.Rd5 a5 3.Ke1 Kb7 4.Kd2 R8c7 5.Bh2 Rf7 6.c5 dxc5 7.Bb5 Rcc7 8.dxc5 Rxc5 9.Rxc5 bxc5 10.Bc4 Rd7+ 11.Ke2 Nh5 12.Be6 Dan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.