Author: Dan Kiski
Date: 12:12:07 12/15/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 1998 at 14:08:56, blass uri wrote: > >On December 15, 1998 at 13:52:29, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On December 15, 1998 at 04:52:19, Dan Kiski wrote: >> >>> >>>As stated a few days ago when the subject of CM6555 and CM Faber\Pilz came along >>>I had found Faber\Pilz beat the standard CM at all time controls. >>> >>>Harold Faber asked if I had tested at 2h\40 I stated I had but would re-test. >>> >>>First to state settings. CM 6555 taken from >>>http://www.konts.lv/usr/Didzis/index.html opening book as stated. >>> >>>I am still not sure that CM6555 is any different from faber\Pilz. >>> >>>All games played on two identical P233 MMX machines each with 64 meg ram. >>>CM hash at 32 meg. >>> >>>Time controls 40 moves in 120 minutes, balance 30 minutes. >>> >>> W L D GAMES SCORE >>>CM 6555 72 52 76 200 110 >>>CM 6000 52 72 76 200 90 >> >>The result is not clearly significant >> >>If you give 2 equal programs to play 200 games and if you assume that the >>probability for white to win is 40% and that the probability for black to win is >>30% >>then the probability of a result of at least 110:90 for one side is close to 10% >> >>The probability of a result at least 110:90 for chessmaster 6555 is close to 5% >>assuming that the programs are equal and the same for a result of at least >>110:90 for chessmaster6000. I must be missing something since each engine had 100 whites and 100 blacks then I don't see your point. I'm also not even sure where you get your 40% for white and 30% for black, where are these numbers coming from. Still either way I never claimed the results significant just posted them out of interest. >> >>Uri >The result may be even less significant because there may be doubled games >because the games were played on different 4 computers > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.