Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 09:24:48 05/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 03, 2004 at 12:14:00, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 03, 2004 at 12:09:50, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On May 03, 2004 at 11:14:59, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On May 03, 2004 at 03:47:41, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>> >>>>On May 03, 2004 at 01:50:44, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 02, 2004 at 21:03:06, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>But it is within the noise >>>>>>range for non-deterministic behavior anyway... >>>>> >>>>>I showed that the difference was statistically >>>>>significant, so that argument holds no water. >>>> >>>>Statistical significance isn't simply a little calculation, you must also care >>>>about the correct statistical setup; how can you believe that you could >>>>contradict the noice theory for non-deterministic behavior with a little math >>>>calcul? Please tell us exactly what you did under what conditions and then what >>>>you've found. Step by step so that we could follow. >>> >>>don't quote nonsense. hyatt shows 1 or 2 positions and very seldom 3 or 5 >>>positions to proof something and then claims 3.1 speedup out of 4. >>> >>>any test done so far over a lot of positions by anyone else than hyatt using his >>>own program, even at his own machine, shows way less than 3.1. >>> >>>2.8 in fact. >>> >>>Anyone denying statistical significance for measuring speedups has a hole in his >>>head. >> >>I have exactly 5 holes in my head. Now let's count the significance. I deny it. >> > >I have seven (you do have eyes, right?) > >Unfortunately, evidence suggests that Vincent does have us beat here... So, you are saying that Vincent has only one single hole open in his head? Let me guess: his mouth? That would be world record. All senses well shut off from reality. :) > > >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>-- >>>>>GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.