Author: James Swafford
Date: 14:42:29 05/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 05, 2004 at 16:32:13, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On May 05, 2004 at 12:42:24, James Swafford wrote: > >Why don't you get a member of ICGA/ICCA and look for yourself? Because I don't care if he did or not. I simply stated that YOU have backed yourself into a corner by: 1. claiming Hyatt published something 2. being asked to support such claim 3. Refusing to do so (or retract your statement) Seriously- you should cite your reference or admit you were wrong =about that point=, or you're going to lose credibility. Do you stand behind your words or not? (Hint: it's a binary question.) -- James > >Hyatt should learn to work with objective speedup numbers instead of >denying that a 30 position test at his own quad is insignificant. > > > >>On May 05, 2004 at 07:53:14, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On May 04, 2004 at 11:49:49, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>I asked for a specific citation for "the JICCA paper" you claimed I wrote and >>>>gave the speedup = 1 + (NCPUS -1) * .7; formula, and also where I claimed it was >>>>good for _any number_ of cpus. >>>> >>>>I know that (a) I didn't write any paper on the Crafty algorithm yet; (b) that >>> >>>YOU DENY THAT YOU WROTE A PAPER PUBLISHED IN ICGA/ICCA ABOUT CRAFTY WHERE YOU >>>CLAIM A 1 + 0.7 (N-1) SPEEDUP? >>> >>>>I have _always_ said that my formula is an approximation that works with up to 8 >>>>processors. >>> >>>it says N for N processors and some posts from you a few years ago indicated it >>>also worked for N=16. >>> >>>>Anything beyond that is your imagination.. >>>>Time to admit it. >>> >>>It has been proven not to be working for n=4 even. >>> >>>>The CCC search engine is available for you to hunt for posts where I claimed >>>>that after you verify there was no JICCA paper whatsoever. >>>>I've called you a liar. >>>>Disprove it or run as you always do... >>> >>>You publish an OFFICIAL paper in the journal of icga and now you claim you >>>didn't write it. It's time to use some of the posts you do here to proof to your >>>government you deny your own papers (about crafty) and commit fraud (in the dts >>>paper) as a professor. >>> >> >> >>Wow Vincent. I think you could've retracted your statement up until >>now... seems you've put yourself in a tight spot. >> >>Why don't you cool off a bit, retract that statement (or prove it?), >>and we can all move on. >> >>-- >>James >> >> >> >>>>You like to use the "fraud" word. I think it is _obvious_ who is the "fraud" >>>>here... Of course you can prove your statement and make me out the fraud again. >>>> >>>>Your move. Clock is ticking.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.