Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Predojevic B. (2503)-Short N. fantastic game by a 16 year old

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 11:19:34 05/20/04

Go up one level in this thread


On May 20, 2004 at 13:43:15, Djordje Vidanovic wrote:

>On May 20, 2004 at 12:52:40, george wrote:
>
>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 exd4 4. Nxd4 Bc5 5. Be3 Qf6 6. c3 b6 7. g3 Bb7 8. Bg2
>>O-O-O 9. O-O h5 10. b4 Bxd4 11. cxd4 h4 12. Nc3 Kb8 13. Rc1 Rc8 14. Nd5 Qg6 15.
>>b5 Na5 16. Nxc7 Rxc7 17. Bf4 d6 18. Rxc7 Kxc7 19. Qc1+ Kb8 20. e5 d5 21. e6+ Ka8
>>22. Qc7 Nf6 23. e7 Rc8 24. Qd8 Qf5 25. Re1 h3 26. Re5 Qb1+ 27. Bf1 a6 28. e8=Q
>>Nxe8 29. Rxe8 Rxd8 30. Rxd8+ Ka7 31. Bb8+ 1/2-1/2
>>
>>
>>
>>well is move 16.Nc7 wrong??? how doi computer eveluate this move???
>>
>>well i loved this game...small little guy showed almost no respect on his
>>oponent..and a 2700 elo player !!!!!!
>
>
>Nice game.  I think that Borki Predojevic was winning somewhere along the way,
>perhaps 28.Qf8! was winning... Not sure though, may be he could have won even
>before that.  Anyway, to try to answer your question about computers and the sac
>on c7:
>
>I don't think that computers would approve of 16.Nc7 because it is too deep and
>there are lots of branchings (haven't checked it though).  Besides, computer
>programs are, ultimately, materialistic.

Based on my experience computer programs are often not materialistic and there
are even cases that they play wrong sacrifices.

I find that there are also cases when they evaluate better than me when I tend
to believe in material.

I do not think that in general computers are more materialistic than humans.

Uri

Uri




  This kind of "intuitive" Tal-esque
>tactics is something that chess software has not attained fully (yet).  First
>harbingers did appear though:  Chess Tiger about two years ago, then Shredder
>7.04, Shredder 8, and, above all, "the speculative beancounters" such as Deep
>Junior (may be the strongest of the batch), and the new versions of Ruffian and
>Deep Sjeng.
>
>Hiarcs and the King, although fantastic attackers, are not so speculative nor
>are they typical beancounters...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.