Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 06:47:55 06/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
Thanks for the information. Let me add in return something important which would also explain the big interest of the journal CSS. Mikhail G. sees himself at eye-height with the programmers of the chess programs. He claims that he has worked on the analyses of "his" positions for years! And he sees himself justified because the test results from Manfred Meiler do show that the CSS-WM-Test ranking list (for actually some 300 engines) is similar to those lists that are made to test playing strength. So, Mikhail claims that his test is ALSO a good indicator for the playing strength, and more, in case of criticism, Mikhail can make the counter argument that his test does only deals with "analytical abilities" which is allegedly the base of all strengths. So, this is the real reason for the mass hypnosis of the dear CSS readers. So, even those who dont like MG still can have the delusion that "their" test is kosher because there is no critic against it. Germans a higher level than Americans? Unfortunately not. I mean, you can say what you want, you can show all the wrong decisions for false political issues of the USA, but take what you want, at least it doesn't end in the so-called (German)total war, where all humanism is de-activated as if there were no longer a future for a people, a country or the whole human race. I wished that Germans could behave a bit longer in that rather untypical, imperfect manner... in politics, but no way in science. That CSS-WM-Test nonsense must find its correct end.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.