Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Do hash tables confuse your matefinding routines?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 07:34:40 12/27/98

Go up one level in this thread


On December 26, 1998 at 18:51:46, Richard A. Fowell (fowell@netcom.com) wrote:

>Do hash tables confuse your matefinding routines?
>
>I tried this mate in 7:
>8/krK5/p7/P7/6P1/8/7Q/8 w - -
>
>on two different chess programs, by two different authors,
>and both reported erroneously short mates when their hash tables were on.
>
>With hash tables off, the correct solution was given by both programs.
>
>In both cases, the programs were using special-purpose matefinding logic
>that had no known problems before.
>
>Can anyone shed any light on this?
>
>Since this problem showed up in the only two programs I tested
>for this, it seems like it may be a widespread issue.
>
>When I use Sigma Chess 4.01 Lite with hash off,
>using the "mate in 7" setting, I get the right answer:
>
>Hash off (Mate in 7) - Kc7-c8, Mate in 7, 948.7 seconds
>Kc7-c8 Rb7-b3
>Qh2-h7 Ka7-a8
>Qh7-e4 Ka8-a7
>Qe4-d4 Ka7-a8
>Qd4-d5 Ka8-a7
>Qd5xb3 Ka7-a8
>Qb3-b7
>
>When I enable hash, Sigma Chess (erroneously) reports mate in 6 -
>with pretty much a different PV for every hash table setting I tried.
>The key move is right, and the time is much shorter
>(2.4 sec, 6.9 sec, 8.0 sec, 11.1 sec, 12.5 sec, 32.6 sec in the cases I tried),
>but the evaluation is wrong.
>
>When I use MacChess 5.0 EN, at level "mate in 7", (which uses hash tables)
>it reports a mate in 4.
>When I use MacChess 4.0 at level "mate in 7", (which does not use hash tables)
>it reports the correct mate in 7, e.g.:
>
>MacChess 4.0 EN
>
>1. Kc8  Rb3
>2. Qc7+ Ka8
>3. Qc6+ Ka7
>4. Qd7+ Ka8
>5. Qd5+ Ka7
>6. Qxb3 Ka8
>7. Qb7#
>
>So ... what's going on, here?
>
>Richard A. Fowell (fowell@netcom.com)

This has to be a bug.  Hash tables can't find a "shorter mate" than actually
exists on the board, unless there is a bug.  Hash tables can let a shallow
search see "much deeper" than you would expect (position fine#70 is the classic
example that programs solve at a much shallower depth than is actually
possible).



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.