Author: Pallav Nawani
Date: 11:07:48 08/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2004 at 12:15:31, Jonas Bylund wrote: >>Even if the program has to be re-written to make it able to accept distributed >>clusters, the main idea behind Nimzo with a lot of modifications could still be >>used by Dr.Donninger. >> >>Jorge > >As hardware programming is very different from what i understand, to "normal" >programming, i am pretty sure Hydra is completely different from Nimzo, Atleast >so different that comparing hydra strength to that of Nimzo is useless. No, not really. That depends on what you mean by hardware programming. If you mean chip design, yes, that's a bit different, but ultimately the logic is represented in one of the various hardware languages, and it is like 'normal' programming with (quite a few differences, which really have to do with the fact that you are now dealing with cycles instead of instructions). If you mean 'embedded systems programming' (The kind of programming that allows a video cd player to play vcds, or a Hardware mp3 player to decode mp3s), then the difference is minimal. In the latter case, it should be relatively easy to carry over Nimzo techniques to Hydra. Regds, Pallav
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.