Author: Alvaro Jose Povoa Cardoso
Date: 15:15:59 08/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2004 at 14:07:48, Pallav Nawani wrote: >On August 30, 2004 at 12:15:31, Jonas Bylund wrote: > >>>Even if the program has to be re-written to make it able to accept distributed >>>clusters, the main idea behind Nimzo with a lot of modifications could still be >>>used by Dr.Donninger. >>> >>>Jorge >> >>As hardware programming is very different from what i understand, to "normal" >>programming, i am pretty sure Hydra is completely different from Nimzo, Atleast >>so different that comparing hydra strength to that of Nimzo is useless. > >No, not really. That depends on what you mean by hardware programming. If you >mean chip design, yes, that's a bit different, but ultimately the logic is >represented in one of the various hardware languages, and it is like 'normal' >programming with (quite a few differences, which really have to do with the fact >that you are now dealing with cycles instead of instructions). I would say it really looks very different. I red a document somewhere where they explained a simplyfied version of their search in a fluxogram and it really doesn't resemble anything we are accustom to do in our 'normal programming'. > >If you mean 'embedded systems programming' (The kind of programming that allows >a video cd player to play vcds, or a Hardware mp3 player to decode mp3s), then >the difference is minimal. > >In the latter case, it should be relatively easy to carry over Nimzo techniques >to Hydra. > >Regds, >Pallav
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.