Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 01:40:39 09/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2004 at 04:12:19, martin fierz wrote: >On September 10, 2004 at 03:20:24, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >hi jorge, > >>difference, please take a closer look. > >take a loser look?? Please be real, anybody can make a typographical error. What are you implying? >all i'll say is that your results are useless, as usual unfortunately. how many >times do people have to tell you that 10 games prove NOTHING AT ALL until you >believe it? > >cheers > martin If you take a closer look and read carefully you will notice that this match is still in progress, only ten games out of 20 were played, there are 10 more games to play. Plus the number of games is not as important as the percentage. If you have a match of 500 games between these two engines and the score ends in 253 to 247 in in favor of Jonny 2.70 or the other way around, it is NOT proving that your match statistically is more convincing than my match of 20 games. I take percentage into consideration not NUMBERS of games. PS: Plus this experiment is NOT just of 20 games, but a series of 20 games matches between two identical engines, with the difference that I switched opening books for Jonny 2.70, since Jonny doesn' have an opening book. Jorge.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.