Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:29:41 10/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2004 at 06:38:28, Tony Werten wrote: >On October 06, 2004 at 05:19:27, Uri Blass wrote: >>If you use mate threat extension(and if I understand correctly you use it) then >>I suggest to limit it to the case when >>the following conditions happens: >>1)There is no another extension for the last 2 plies. >>2)The side that threats the mate has not a big advantage of more than 2 pawns >>and it means that the evaluation is better than 2 pawns against the side to >>move. > >3) You do not have winning capture on the piece that delivers the checkmate. > >Tony 3 may help in game but unfortunately I am afraid it does not help to solve WAC141 [D]4r1k1/p1qr1p2/2pb1Bp1/1p5p/3P1n1R/1B3P2/PP3PK1/2Q4R w - - 0 1 1.Qxf4 Bxf4 2.Rxh5 gxh5 is part of the line that you need to see. black has a winning capture on the piece that delivers the checkmate(2....gxh5) but unfortunately 2.Rxh5 is still the right move. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.