Author: blass uri
Date: 11:57:48 01/11/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 1999 at 14:16:13, KarinsDad wrote: >On January 11, 1999 at 13:31:01, blass uri wrote: > >>> >>>Or, depending on who you believe, Kasparov tried that sequence of moves out >>>against Fritz over and over and won every game, even if fritz did sacrifice >>>the piece on e6. To date no computer has been able to win the white side of >>>this game against a strong human (or computer) opponent. So even this game >>>shows that DB is fearsome... >> >>The question is if the black side played the same as kasparov and the computers >>with white failed to win because they did not follow deep blue's good moves. >> >>I think that kasparov's move Qe7 was not the right move and he should play >>fxe6(this is not the only mistake of kasparov in the game) and this prove that >>he was not ready for this line. > >Uri, > >Please explain something here to me. I do not have the game you are referring to >in front of me, but I do not understand your point. > >Every human player has a set of opening and variation information, be it to move >2 or to move 20 in a given variation. A player can understand the ideas of a >variation without necessarily knowing it cold (to 25 moves or some such). If a >given variation seems to be strong against computers (as per Robert's posting), >I can easily envision someone of Kasparov's talent playing the line, even if he >does not know it cold. > >What does your claim of "this proves that he was not ready for this line" mean? >Does it mean that he only knew it to move 12? or move 14? or move 18? I mean that he was not prepared to play it at move 8 His 7th move was a move that he did not recommend in the batsford chess opening book. I think that the move was not a mistake but he was not prepared to play this move. There were 2 theory moves in Move 8 and I believe that he chose the wrong one. This was the opinion of me and also the opinion of a grandmaster that I talked with him. I also heard that kasparov looked surprised after Deeper blue played the theory move 8.Nxe6. Just >because Kasparov made mistakes does not mean that he is not familiar with a >given line. Maybe he saw something that you do not and he was incorrect in his >evaluation. Or maybe he prepared a line and missed a continuation. Nobody can >really tell. The most your example seems to "prove" is that Kasparov made a >mistake. > >Do you understand why your statement confuses me? I understand but the mistake Qe7 was early in the game and I believe kasparov could know that fxe6 is better than Qxe7 if he looked at games of other players. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.