Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 10:16:30 11/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 2004 at 06:41:20, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On November 04, 2004 at 17:26:08, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >Hi, Hi, > >I believe we have the same opinion :-) >So we don't have to discuss a longer time :-)) OK! > >>I always supported the idea of promoting more than one program. I always told >>people to try to buy 2 or 3 programs every year based on the way they use the >>programs and to use them to learn if this is what they would like. >>Some people are not willing to lose games or too many games, but I am ready to >>lose them all if this can improve my way to play. >>I cannot do this with Kasparov as he would get bored soon, but a chess program >>will play forever the way a user want, so it is a marvellous tool to help people >>to improve their way to play. >>Now that we have programs playing close to the way I always wanted and good >>enough to be able to teach indirectly how to play. I mean winning and showing >>weaknesses on the opponents, most people do not buy them as they did some years >>ago. >>Many players keep saying that the ones they have are already too strong, so they >>do not need a stronger one. >>Well, if you let play latest chess programs against older ones one can see that >>they would be beaten easily most of the time. This shows that they were not so >>strong, but still weak and the players who do not know how to win are only >>weakers than them. The only way to learn is to be able to play against strongest >>players, after reading chess books and see what is in the books. >>I mean that more people should buy chess programs now that in the past like >>other computer games that are now much better as being more realistic also due >>to a better graphics... > >I agree with you. > >>No, I think everybody can have his own opinion and we have to respect other's >>opinions. > >Yes! > >>I do not like to judge other chess programs, but prefer other people to judge >>them. > >This is right! >On the other hand not easy to give a comment if a keyboard is in the near :-) > >>I get fun to make the openings book and I am satisfied if the people like them, >>but then immediately I start thinking how to make them better...maybe I am a >>little too crazy...I guess I am crazy about chess and chess programs since a >>long time...anybody has a medicine for this? > >No Sandro! >One time computer chess, computer chess for ever! >You have the same problem as others and this is your problem to solved it. Thanks for the help:-) >You make it with your Shredder book, I have fun on the compatibility we have >today (my main interest, try to power it with Arena and I am happy that I found >Martin to do it). I am so far a happy computer chess player and have no more >wishes. All what I need for do my hobby I have, OK I am searching an older Chess >Computer modul (RISC 1 by Ed) :-)) > >Medicine: >A girlfriend with understandings is important! >The best medicine for me :-) > >My girlfriend hold the cup in Leiden, we won with Ruffian. >Lisa sent the cup with a tablet of my favorite chocolate to Per-Ola :-) > >We need more ladys in computer chess fora and the most of the discuss have an >other niveau. > >A lot of things we do with Arena are ideas from Lisa and the ideas are good. >The secret lady of Arena developement :-) > >Believe me a good medicine! >And she has Italien luck and temparament :-)) :-) > >In the time we tested Ruffian without ponder vs. Shredder 7.04 Lisa give the >comment ... Frank give up, Ruffian is in the near but Shredder is a tic better! >I say Lisa wait, tomorrow in the morning you can see Ruffian is in front. She go >looking in the night and say to me, Frank today we drive an the town and make us >a good day before you go to your PC :-)) :-) > >Best >Frank > Ciao Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.