Author: stuart taylor
Date: 15:54:32 01/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 2005 at 17:50:26, Richard Harrison wrote: >Robert, > > Thanks for sharing the game. Very dynamic. > Hiarcs move 17. Be2 is weak...and then 19. Kd2 just throws the game away. >Even with the short time controls, surprised it couldn't find better moves. >Then again, it is playing against a monster (Shredder 9)! Is this a beta version? Does the idea of "monster" apply to computer vs. computer? With humans, there the overwhelm and emotional aspects. But with computers, the idea of monster would just mean a general categorization of its depth of evaluation etc. with the majority of its moves, compared with the opponent. So I would like to see more of Shredder 9, but if we speak of this game alone, I'd like to know more of the details of its moves, and exactly how bad Hiarcs 17 and 19 were. Oh! and of course, I don't have an easy way of playing through these games, as I would need to set up a chess set and play each move manually, something which I believe those of us who play it from this text don't normally need to do. (this will hopefully change when I get a new computer and living accomodation). S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.