Author: Mark Young
Date: 04:15:35 02/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2005 at 15:41:16, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On February 15, 2005 at 14:48:45, Mark Young wrote: > >>On February 15, 2005 at 06:15:02, George Tsavdaris wrote: >> >>>On February 14, 2005 at 23:47:13, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>sorry...16 g3! >>> >>> Yes against humans Kasparov perhaps would play it, but against Junior after >>>16...Nh2+ 17.Kf2 Ng4+ 18.Kg2 Qh2+ 19.Kf3 h5 the positions starts to be TOO >>>complicated for any human to play against a tactical monster and especially Deep >>>Junior! >>> >>>But how about 18.Ke1!.....? I think if Kasparov have seen this it would play >>>16.g3! So perhaps you are right.................After 18.Ke1! Qh2 19.Kd1 and >>>white has the advantage............... >> >>I think he saw the right plan after g3!. He just did not want to risk missing >>something. Looking at it now, it seems he made a mistake. I don't think it was >>very risky at all for a player like Kasparov's. > > It is a suicide to play a game full of tactics with your King in the center, >against a Chess engine EVEN if you are Kasparov.......... > >>White is just clearly winning. >>The point is Bxh2? is not a good move, but a losing move by force. > >No. The position is much more difficult and tricky than you think and it's far >from a winning one. I disagree and will play it out with you, if you wish. This is a won position for white. Once you work out how white king can escape, black's attack fades away. With a big big advantage for white, more then enough to win. Remember all black has in the attack is one Queen and a knight and he is down a bishop for a pawn. If you can break the attack which white can do, black is lost, with the sac refuted. One main reason is the weak e3 Pawn which causes many >problems for white even after having his King at d1 or c1.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.