Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 04:13:33 05/06/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 2005 at 06:55:32, Werner Kraft wrote: >The question nowaday is : > >What kind of strategie can we develop for human brains to play the ultra-precise >moves that are required to be able to still have a 50:50 chance against >computers ? The idea is all wrong that in chess there is a need for "ultra-precise" moves "to be able to have (at least) a 50:50 chance against computers". It's a fairy tale that machines could play a superior chess. The chess they do play is in fact a horrible emulation of a far similarity of human chess. The point is that with all the tricks of the operating team a machine would still be like putty in the hands of a chess master. That is BTW the main reason for the events around the 1997 match between DBII and Kasparov. The team around DBII failed to prove their machine's authenticity. And Kasparov was good advised to stop the ballyhoo and continuing himself in an as if mode - as if he played sound chess. This way he still sacked 600 000 US$$ from the American company. IBM then left the field for good. Kasparov played chess untill 2005. MfG
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.