Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Komputer Korner apology

Author: Ricardo Gibert

Date: 01:51:16 05/19/05

Go up one level in this thread


On May 19, 2005 at 04:20:03, Jonas Cohonas wrote:

>>Dear KK,
>>
>>If you would write in paragraph form, with sentences grouped by relationship to
>>a particular thought or point, your thoughts would be much easier to read &
>>understand.
>>
>>Paragraphs can have a lead sentence (so the reader knows the next point that is
>>to be discussed), and end with a conclusionary sentence when a point is
>>illustrated or proven.  I'm no writing expert, but you know what I mean.
>>
>>Several paragraphs in a row, when related, can elucidate or cover a particular
>>theme of the author--from introduction, to conclusion.
>>
>>By writing in a l-o-o-o-n-g single paragraph, it is easy to mix several points
>>so thoroughly that the reader gets confused.  It is hard to tell when a totally
>>new theme is being introduced, or when the text is hearkening back to a
>>previously introduced theme that may or may not have been concluded.
>>
>>Did you always write in such a mono-paragraph style?
>>
>>Thanks for considering this writing style change,
>>
>>A reader,
>>--Steve
>
>I must admit, i haven't bothered to read his posts because of this single
>paragraph "style", so needless to say i agree with you Steve.

I've tried reading some of his posts, but always give up fairly quickly.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.