Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Obfuscation of Fafis

Author: Evgenii Manev

Date: 05:02:22 05/28/05

Go up one level in this thread

On May 28, 2005 at 05:14:57, Matthias Gemuh wrote:

>On May 27, 2005 at 17:21:42, Thomas Mayer wrote:
>>Hi Alex,
>>> Or strange legal positions like this mate in 1:
>>> 1QqQqQq1/r6Q/Q6q/q6Q/B2q4/q6Q/k6K/1qQ1QqRb w - - 0 1
>>> Crafty calculates in the background and gives no output, like Fafis.
>>this one does not proof anything. The engine is simply lost in the qsearch. This
>>happens to most engines which a) do not restrict qsearch to a specific depth
>>(correct for most - e.g. Fritz... :) and b) do not check for input during the
>>qsearch, which is also true for most engines.
>>The other stuff makes one at least quite suspicious, but it's not yet fully
>>convincing. I wonder what the other programmers think about that.
>>Greets, Thomas
>Hi Thomas,
>when compiling Quark, do you obfuscate as Fafis does ?
>Why should a hobby engine need that ?

may be because the author has idea that his engine will go commercial?

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.