Author: Evgenii Manev
Date: 05:02:22 05/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 28, 2005 at 05:14:57, Matthias Gemuh wrote: >On May 27, 2005 at 17:21:42, Thomas Mayer wrote: > >>Hi Alex, >> >>> Or strange legal positions like this mate in 1: >>> >>> 1QqQqQq1/r6Q/Q6q/q6Q/B2q4/q6Q/k6K/1qQ1QqRb w - - 0 1 >>> >>> Crafty calculates in the background and gives no output, like Fafis. >> >>this one does not proof anything. The engine is simply lost in the qsearch. This >>happens to most engines which a) do not restrict qsearch to a specific depth >>(correct for most - e.g. Fritz... :) and b) do not check for input during the >>qsearch, which is also true for most engines. >> >>The other stuff makes one at least quite suspicious, but it's not yet fully >>convincing. I wonder what the other programmers think about that. >> >>Greets, Thomas > > > >Hi Thomas, >when compiling Quark, do you obfuscate as Fafis does ? >Why should a hobby engine need that ? >Matthias. may be because the author has idea that his engine will go commercial? regards, Geno
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.