Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 02:15:51 05/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
The reason why courts and justice and judges and juries exist at all is the important fact that we cant accept plausibility proofs. If something is looking like something (forbidden) it's still not sure that it's forbidden. To analyse that we have courts and judges and experts. You are NOT tournament director, you are NOT judge. You are one of many experts. You have opinions but you don't have proofs! A. Schmidt doesn't have proofs either. So, you two can't decide a case. A tournament director could decide, although it might be the wrong decision. It's funny when people "prove" something outside courthouses in an "as if" procedure. Ok, the worst what could happen is that someone else is branded for life - for the wrong reasons. Bad luck then for the branded kid... In other words, you personally have nothing to lose if you make a false decision. A few smileys will do the job.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.