Author: Evgenii Manev
Date: 04:03:45 05/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2005 at 05:15:51, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >The reason why courts and justice and judges and juries exist at all is the >important fact that we cant accept plausibility proofs. If something is looking >like something (forbidden) it's still not sure that it's forbidden. To analyse >that we have courts and judges and experts. > >You are NOT tournament director, you are NOT judge. You are one of many experts. >You have opinions but you don't have proofs! A. Schmidt doesn't have proofs >either. So, you two can't decide a case. A tournament director could decide, >although it might be the wrong decision. > >It's funny when people "prove" something outside courthouses in an "as if" >procedure. Ok, the worst what could happen is that someone else is branded for >life - for the wrong reasons. Bad luck then for the branded kid... In other >words, you personally have nothing to lose if you make a false decision. A few >smileys will do the job.
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.