Author: James T. Walker
Date: 07:56:15 06/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2005 at 10:46:25, Roger D Davis wrote: >On June 26, 2005 at 10:14:14, K. Burcham wrote: > >> >>At this time, I do not believe that Hydra beat GM Michael Adams, 2737, in match >>play. >>At this time I do not believe the results of this match. >>At this time I believe that someone has an agenda that I am not aware of. >>At this time I believe that money has influenced the match results. >> >>At this time I do not believe that all GM and Super GM that watched and/or have >>analysed these games are saying: "damn I cannot believe these moves and >>positions that the machine was able to play, this is truely 2700 Super GM play". >> >>Webster: skepticism >>a : the doctrine that true knowledge or knowledge in a particular area is >>uncertain >>b : the method of suspended judgment, systematic doubt, or criticism >>characteristic of skeptics. >> >>http://www.fide.com/ratings/toparc.phtml?cod=77 >>http://www.fide.com/ratings/card.phtml?event=400041 >> >>kburcham > >I think Kramnik-Fritz and Kaspy-Junior were probalby fixed, not necessarily each >game, but the match result. I don't think Hydra-Adams is. > >I think the burden of proof is on the conspiracy theorist. Unfortunately, since >there is no proof, so the conspiracy theory doesn't stand up. > >Roger Yes, so where is your proof the above mentioned matches were fixed. The conspiracy theorist make the same claims after each human/computer match. It's easy to sit on the sidelines and kibitz. The pressure of being the one playing is quite different. Have you never been there?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.