Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Written to Anthony Cozzie,chess computer comunity, and Zappa

Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo

Date: 19:34:03 07/10/05

Go up one level in this thread


On July 10, 2005 at 22:04:56, Juan Pablo Naar C. wrote:

>On July 10, 2005 at 21:40:28, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote:
>
>>
>>Anthony.
>>
>>I have been very busy the last days.
>>
>> For that reason I have not answer your post, "where you have insulted to me
>>before."
>>
>>My answer will be very simple. "I am not going to make any insult against you",
>>and I am going to continue playing engines until my God get to me, energy, life,
>>and opportunity. The “resigns word” doesn’t exist in my life.
>>
>>I was reading other post where, Fernando Villegas ("Thanks Fernando") wrote some
>>ideas. .......... Now, Anthony when you answer to Fernando you tell
>>there,....... "Pablo asked for a match, I declined, and then ..............“he
>>spends 5 hours bitching at the ICC live broadcast” about how I'm ducking him.
>>That is why I'm so annoyed."
>>
>>Anthony........... This is absolute false.!!!!
>>
>> I am not in ICC; I want to be sincere. I don’t like ICC.
>>
>>ICC in my last account banned to me, because I was playing antichess, my own
>>style, and beating engines!! type Pablo-Restrepo, Mar 16-2005/2011.
>>
>>If you want to go to ICC it is your business. I respect to ICC, but I want to be
>>sincere in other direction too: You are going to find there a great fortress,
>>where they are going to protect your ego, banning guys like me that know how to
>>play a perfect antichess, but your prize will be that you are not going to be
>>better.
>>
>>This is the more important difference in computer atmosphere between ICC and
>>play chess. Playchess, have got to me the opportunity and got to  many other
>>human beings better than  me,  to play against engines. All the time I have want
>>into engines room. Now I have played more of 6.000 games against engines into
>>playchess.
>>
>>There are many smart people into playchess. For me the smartest are Hydra Team.
>>
>>Do you know why? Because the have the humility to recognize the mistakes of
>>Hydra, making the engine better and better all the days. Last year I won 2 times
>>and make several draws against Hydra in 60+15 time control, and 40,000 Kilo
>>nodes each second.  Now in 2.005, In my last games, I have not been capable to
>>drunk the great Hydra, and I have had just 2 draws in 10+10 and 70.000 to
>>115,000 Kilo nodes per second before the Challenger Vs G.M. Michael Adams.
>>
>>There is a simple important question..……………………………………. Why Hydra has invited to
>>me or has accepted to play chess against me, a simple amateur?
>>
>>Remember, I don’t have any title, I don’t have Fide ego, I am not a master, I
>>don’t have a P.H.D., I don’t have teams for marketing, for news tactics, etc
>>(all the things that make the power). The answer is simple, because they wants
>>to make the best engine, and now they not only have the best engine, they have
>>the more important chess player in the chess history, better than Gary Kasparov.
>>
>>I want to be sincere in other way……………... It is truth that I don’t have any
>>title, or high studies, but I have been studying engines by myself 25 years,
>>since chess challenger # 7 in 1980.
>>
>>Since 1999 more or less playing 6 hours per day………...what I want to say, it is
>>that in the life a P.H.D. is very important, and will be the best that any human
>>being of the Earth planet could being P.H.D. Maybe the Earth will be better (or
>>worst), But not... ………………..
>>
>>You can be sure that a P.H.D. or a title, by itself don’t have the power to open
>>the door of the sky, or to close the back door of the zappa fortress.
>>
>>Now ..... How could an engine beat to me? ,,,,,,, The answer is simple..... Just
>>to put 10% more value to my own pawns...It is all .....
>>
>>But the problem is very very more complicate..... Look.…………..All the engines are
>>walking by a knife, fighting for get the great Word Chess Computer Champion. In
>>that way, everyone must have a competitive parameters. Now, the great Job from
>>Omega-13 from playchess, Derek Paquette, with his antifather book, has been
>>really good, the same that "black watch" has implemented against me... but it is
>>a not competitive book in Man Vs Machine Top Challengers. Did you understand?
>>
>>If you want to make to me a check matte, must to build and put into the
>>marketing engines anti father. Look!! This is ridiculous.
>>
>>The problem to continue..... When all the engines are turning onn, are they
>>going to be into a standard and principal antifather parameters or book? No!!
>>and of course, when the "fathers"(all the antichess players of the Earth) will
>>be  challenger, are they going to make permission to change the parameters for
>>antihuman parameters, for the sponsors? Of course not.
>>
>>Look .,.....just like a dream .... If you to accept a challenger against me, and
>>change the parameters to destroy to me, you are going to win....
>>repeat,”you”………….....but not “zappa.” Because zappa will be playing a mixed
>>parameters, the human instructions, more, its all-high power.
>>
>>I know many more things about engines, like for example, that if I could play
>>hydra at home every day, in minus of a mount hydra will be in several troubles.
>>But I am, not going to make this never, I am to continue just playing engines
>>until the second, minute, day, and time that God get to me the opportunity.
>>
>>I challenger you, ICC, chess computer programmers, of all square of the Earth,
>>to build and engine, that beat for ever the antialgorithm style, the antichess,
>>the unique way to beat the engines.
>
>Well, if you study really hard and dedicated the "antichess anti-algorithm",
>(and your games :-)) you could "teach" an engine when the opponent is playing it
>and how to counter-attack it by adding extra knowledge, that is not a problem,
>but perhaps a challenge.
>
>>
>> Like the Top G.M. Lasker said.  “You  must to study your opponent.” In that
>>way, only the human beings that will be studding the algorithm of the engines,
>>could will have a chance to win them.
>>
>>If the V.I.P want to play engines in the Orthodoxies lines, it is ok, it is the
>>business of everyone, very respectable. The G.M. Michael Adams is one of the
>>seven best chess players of the Earth. He has played against Hydra as a warrior,
>>with much courage, but with an arc.
>>
>>My position in the table is not strong. I will be very happy if some day I could
>>play a challenger in live against a G.M., anonimus match. Not news. Never in my
>>life I have had that opportunity. I will be very happy If I could play a
>>challenger against your engine in the exactly parameters that have  played G.M.
>>Elvesth, and against the exactly conditions that G.M. Adams played Hydra,
>>against Hydra. Of course with vigilance in every side of the combat, for have
>>safe that none has human or computer assistance.
>>
>>You have said that I am a "moron". Don’t worry, I am not going to be more or
>>minus smart because the people say to me one or a million of things. My new
>>challenger is now different. Me(the moron), challenger to you(the P.H.D.) to
>>build and engine (ZAPPA), that avoid my general strategy. I am just to wait some
>>time, to save that engine from the web, and to discover if the P.H.D. is
>>stronger that the MORON.
>>
>>With all respect for you and everyone in the chess computer community,
>>
>>Pablo
>>Note 1.
>> If anyone tell to me today…… What is the state of art in the battle man vs.
>>machine, my answer will be:
>>For now…  game over. Human beings 0, engines 1.
>
>Hey Pablo, eres de Colombia? (Vi tu bandera en playchess). Si es asi, estoy
>feliz de er un compañero de mi pais en esta comunidad :-)

Hola Juan Pablo.
Si lo soy. Cual es tu nickname en playchess.?
Saludos,
Pablo




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.