Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 19:34:03 07/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 10, 2005 at 22:04:56, Juan Pablo Naar C. wrote: >On July 10, 2005 at 21:40:28, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: > >> >>Anthony. >> >>I have been very busy the last days. >> >> For that reason I have not answer your post, "where you have insulted to me >>before." >> >>My answer will be very simple. "I am not going to make any insult against you", >>and I am going to continue playing engines until my God get to me, energy, life, >>and opportunity. The “resigns word” doesn’t exist in my life. >> >>I was reading other post where, Fernando Villegas ("Thanks Fernando") wrote some >>ideas. .......... Now, Anthony when you answer to Fernando you tell >>there,....... "Pablo asked for a match, I declined, and then ..............“he >>spends 5 hours bitching at the ICC live broadcast” about how I'm ducking him. >>That is why I'm so annoyed." >> >>Anthony........... This is absolute false.!!!! >> >> I am not in ICC; I want to be sincere. I don’t like ICC. >> >>ICC in my last account banned to me, because I was playing antichess, my own >>style, and beating engines!! type Pablo-Restrepo, Mar 16-2005/2011. >> >>If you want to go to ICC it is your business. I respect to ICC, but I want to be >>sincere in other direction too: You are going to find there a great fortress, >>where they are going to protect your ego, banning guys like me that know how to >>play a perfect antichess, but your prize will be that you are not going to be >>better. >> >>This is the more important difference in computer atmosphere between ICC and >>play chess. Playchess, have got to me the opportunity and got to many other >>human beings better than me, to play against engines. All the time I have want >>into engines room. Now I have played more of 6.000 games against engines into >>playchess. >> >>There are many smart people into playchess. For me the smartest are Hydra Team. >> >>Do you know why? Because the have the humility to recognize the mistakes of >>Hydra, making the engine better and better all the days. Last year I won 2 times >>and make several draws against Hydra in 60+15 time control, and 40,000 Kilo >>nodes each second. Now in 2.005, In my last games, I have not been capable to >>drunk the great Hydra, and I have had just 2 draws in 10+10 and 70.000 to >>115,000 Kilo nodes per second before the Challenger Vs G.M. Michael Adams. >> >>There is a simple important question..……………………………………. Why Hydra has invited to >>me or has accepted to play chess against me, a simple amateur? >> >>Remember, I don’t have any title, I don’t have Fide ego, I am not a master, I >>don’t have a P.H.D., I don’t have teams for marketing, for news tactics, etc >>(all the things that make the power). The answer is simple, because they wants >>to make the best engine, and now they not only have the best engine, they have >>the more important chess player in the chess history, better than Gary Kasparov. >> >>I want to be sincere in other way……………... It is truth that I don’t have any >>title, or high studies, but I have been studying engines by myself 25 years, >>since chess challenger # 7 in 1980. >> >>Since 1999 more or less playing 6 hours per day………...what I want to say, it is >>that in the life a P.H.D. is very important, and will be the best that any human >>being of the Earth planet could being P.H.D. Maybe the Earth will be better (or >>worst), But not... ……………….. >> >>You can be sure that a P.H.D. or a title, by itself don’t have the power to open >>the door of the sky, or to close the back door of the zappa fortress. >> >>Now ..... How could an engine beat to me? ,,,,,,, The answer is simple..... Just >>to put 10% more value to my own pawns...It is all ..... >> >>But the problem is very very more complicate..... Look.…………..All the engines are >>walking by a knife, fighting for get the great Word Chess Computer Champion. In >>that way, everyone must have a competitive parameters. Now, the great Job from >>Omega-13 from playchess, Derek Paquette, with his antifather book, has been >>really good, the same that "black watch" has implemented against me... but it is >>a not competitive book in Man Vs Machine Top Challengers. Did you understand? >> >>If you want to make to me a check matte, must to build and put into the >>marketing engines anti father. Look!! This is ridiculous. >> >>The problem to continue..... When all the engines are turning onn, are they >>going to be into a standard and principal antifather parameters or book? No!! >>and of course, when the "fathers"(all the antichess players of the Earth) will >>be challenger, are they going to make permission to change the parameters for >>antihuman parameters, for the sponsors? Of course not. >> >>Look .,.....just like a dream .... If you to accept a challenger against me, and >>change the parameters to destroy to me, you are going to win.... >>repeat,”you”………….....but not “zappa.” Because zappa will be playing a mixed >>parameters, the human instructions, more, its all-high power. >> >>I know many more things about engines, like for example, that if I could play >>hydra at home every day, in minus of a mount hydra will be in several troubles. >>But I am, not going to make this never, I am to continue just playing engines >>until the second, minute, day, and time that God get to me the opportunity. >> >>I challenger you, ICC, chess computer programmers, of all square of the Earth, >>to build and engine, that beat for ever the antialgorithm style, the antichess, >>the unique way to beat the engines. > >Well, if you study really hard and dedicated the "antichess anti-algorithm", >(and your games :-)) you could "teach" an engine when the opponent is playing it >and how to counter-attack it by adding extra knowledge, that is not a problem, >but perhaps a challenge. > >> >> Like the Top G.M. Lasker said. “You must to study your opponent.” In that >>way, only the human beings that will be studding the algorithm of the engines, >>could will have a chance to win them. >> >>If the V.I.P want to play engines in the Orthodoxies lines, it is ok, it is the >>business of everyone, very respectable. The G.M. Michael Adams is one of the >>seven best chess players of the Earth. He has played against Hydra as a warrior, >>with much courage, but with an arc. >> >>My position in the table is not strong. I will be very happy if some day I could >>play a challenger in live against a G.M., anonimus match. Not news. Never in my >>life I have had that opportunity. I will be very happy If I could play a >>challenger against your engine in the exactly parameters that have played G.M. >>Elvesth, and against the exactly conditions that G.M. Adams played Hydra, >>against Hydra. Of course with vigilance in every side of the combat, for have >>safe that none has human or computer assistance. >> >>You have said that I am a "moron". Don’t worry, I am not going to be more or >>minus smart because the people say to me one or a million of things. My new >>challenger is now different. Me(the moron), challenger to you(the P.H.D.) to >>build and engine (ZAPPA), that avoid my general strategy. I am just to wait some >>time, to save that engine from the web, and to discover if the P.H.D. is >>stronger that the MORON. >> >>With all respect for you and everyone in the chess computer community, >> >>Pablo >>Note 1. >> If anyone tell to me today…… What is the state of art in the battle man vs. >>machine, my answer will be: >>For now… game over. Human beings 0, engines 1. > >Hey Pablo, eres de Colombia? (Vi tu bandera en playchess). Si es asi, estoy >feliz de er un compañero de mi pais en esta comunidad :-) Hola Juan Pablo. Si lo soy. Cual es tu nickname en playchess.? Saludos, Pablo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.