Author: Bahram Namjou
Date: 17:05:18 08/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
This is analysis by hiarcs 9 (p4, 3.2 ghz, 128 hash). It did RxC6 in about 90 sec....bn Analysis by Hiarcs 9: +- (4.84) 1.Rxc6+ bxc6 2.Kxe4 Ke7 00:00:00 +- (5.13) 1.b4 Kd7 2.Rxc6 Kxc6 00:00:00 +- (4.76) 1.Rxc6+ Kxc6 2.Kxe4 Kd6 3.a4 Ke7 4.a5 00:00:00 +- (5.00) 1.b4 Ke7 2.Rxc6 bxc6 3.Kxe4 Kf6 00:00:00 +- (5.34) 1.f6 Ke6 2.Rxg5 Kxf6 3.Rc5 Bd7 4.g5+ Kg6 5.Kxe4 00:00:00 +- (5.36) 1.Kd4 Ke7 2.Re5+ Kf7 3.Re6 00:00:01 +- (5.48) 1.Ra5 Ke7 2.Re5+ Kf7 3.Re6 a5 4.b4 a4 5.Rg6 Bd5 6.h3 b5 00:00:02 +- (5.72) 1.Kd4 Ke7 2.Rxc6 bxc6 3.Kxe4 Kd6 4.b3 Kd7 5.b4 Kd6 00:00:08 +- (6.08) 1.Ra5 Be8 2.Kxe4 Bb5 3.Kd4 b6 4.Rxb5 axb5 5.b4 00:00:30 +- (7.04) 1.Kd4 Ke7 2.Rxc6 bxc6 3.Kxe4 Kd6 4.b4 Ke7 5.Ke5 Kf7 6.f6 c5 7.bxc5 00:00:57 +- (7.59) 1.Rxc6+ Kxc6 2.Kxe4 Kd6 3.b4 b6 4.a4 Ke7 5.Kd5 Kd7 6.Ke5 Ke8 7.Kf6 b5 8.axb5 00:01:36 (, Home 30.08.2005) On August 30, 2005 at 16:40:55, Ray Rogers wrote: >Human Style or Lazy? > >This position occurred during a game in Margate in 2000. > >[D] 8/1p6/p1bk4/2R2Pp1/4p1P1/P3K3/1P5P/8 w - - 0 46 > >White, a stronger player than I, went with Kd4 and of course black resigned but >only on move 57. I was watching and thought Rxc6 might produce instant >resignation! The next day I put this to my electronic friends, RISC 1mb and >Rebel 7 agreed in a few seconds whilst HIARCS 7.32, R30 (1995) and others liked >Kd4. > >Clearly RxB snuffs out any chance of black sticking a "cheapo" on him. > >Was I thinking like a human or just being lazy? > >I'm not a programmer but would be interested in the programmers' point of view. > >What would you WANT your program to play here? > >Thanks. > >Ray. > >ps. If you think you've seen this before Eric Hallsworth published my letter in >Selective Search No. 89.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.