Author: Clive Munro
Date: 03:29:18 10/06/05
Go up one level in this thread
"look beyond the psychology and concentrate on the chessboard and become obsessed >with finding the strongest move at all times, regardless of what the opponent is >made of." I think that finding the strongest move on the board does depend on whom you are playing at the time. I remember Kasparov playing Nigel Short in the 1993 Times World Championship, Nigel was in a winning position but short on time. The commentators had already pointed out a winning combination for Nigel. Kasparov thought for a long time, the commentators joked that maybe Kasparov was going to produce an extra Queen or something. The audience (us) were listing on headphones and laughed at this. Kasparov immediately raised his hands and glared at us, then settled back down and played an outrageously aggressive pawn move. Nobody had looked at this but after 30 secs or so the commentators realised that this move did nothing. However the move shook Nigel up so much that after using up even more of his precious time offered a draw. Kasparov snatched his hand off! "What Mr. Karpov is obviously not aware of is how much his statements on this >subject says about himself and his reasoning as opposed to a general explanation >of why "Humans occasionally lose to computers in long timed games"." If you look at my earlier post I think you will find that Karpov not only doesn’t know about Fruit and co but also doesn’t care. For Karpov to play chess it’s a battle against a human opponent and all the physiological extras that brings. For him playing a computer is something you do to pass the time before crushing an opponent for real. Best Clive
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.