Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 05:13:31 11/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 2005 at 03:52:57, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 22, 2005 at 03:10:35, Ernst Walet wrote: > >>...makes me sick in the stomage. >> >>QUOTE >> >> When you play through this game, take a look at the forced sequence commencing >>with Fritz’ …Bc2, and count how many ply there are from there to the position >>when Matthias Feist resigned on Fritz’ behalf. Then add a few more ply because, >>in the final position, although Black will inevitably be saddled with a decisive >>material deficit, at that moment the program still had two minor pieces for a >>rook. So the depth to which Fritz would have needed to search in the critical >>variation, in order to realise that …Bc2 was a losing move rather than a winning >>one, was quite beyond the program’s capability. >> >>UNQUOTE >> >>So much for the human like "knowledge" of Fritz. >> >>Ernst. > > >This position is from the game > >Fruit has no problem to evaluate it by static evaluation as advantage for white. > >It has no "human" knowledge about bad trades. >Note that this is not the only explanation and Movei also has no human knowledge >about bad trades(it simply evaluates bishop and knight as more than 3 pawns so >it usually avoid bad trades) and it seems that fruit simply has superior >knowledge about pawn structure. > >6: Ponomariov,R - Fritz, Man vs Machine II 2005 >[D]8/P4pk1/2bp4/P2p4/2nPp2p/4P2P/6K1/2R5 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fruit 2.2.1: > >47.Kf2 > = (0.24) Depth: 1/6 00:00:00 > > >Uri It might have a highly over-optimistic evaluation of the white a pawn on a7 as well, that just happens to "work out ok" in this position.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.