Author: Zappa
Date: 07:48:10 12/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2005 at 06:46:02, Ryan B. wrote: >On December 16, 2005 at 05:03:13, Claude Le Page wrote: > >>All this is quite interesting , but would it be possible to extend your analysis >>to TogaII 1.1 ( I emphasize 1.1 since it seems to have been a huge change , both >>of strength and style , between 1.0 and 1.1 ) ? >>I made a set of thematic tournaments , drawn from my corr. games with >>TogaII 1.1a >>Shredder9 >>Fritz9 >>Rybka 1.0 Beta 32 bits >>Junior9 >>GambitFruit 4bx >>On 5 tournaments , I get : >>1 Toga 28,5/50 >>2-3 Shredder and Fritz 27,5/50 >>4-5 Rybka and Junior 23/50 >>6 Gambit Fruit 20,5 / 50 >>So TogaII 1.1a must not be forgotten !! > >Its just Fruit with some changes. Most of them help mostly at blitz time >control. One interesting test is to analyze with Toga 1.1 and with Fruit 2.2 >and notice that Toga reaches a higher depth early on yet if you wait long enough >Fruit not only catches up to Toga but passes Toga in search depth. The blitz >results by Toga are impressive though. > >Ryan Ryan is of course correct. Toga basically plays the same as Fruit except for its extended history pruning, which only works in blitz. anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.