Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Thanks for extracting this!

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 03:46:22 01/03/06

Go up one level in this thread

On January 03, 2006 at 06:30:51, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On January 02, 2006 at 18:29:31, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>>On January 02, 2006 at 15:11:08, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>>In my eyes what rybka doing is very basic. Like fruit's eval + simple kingsafety
>>>+ very little more than that, but real well tuned.
>>>In my definition that is not much. That's real simple stuff.
>>I don't think it is so simple...I strongly suspect that Rybka has a special
>>evaluation fuction with a _lot_ of knowledge inside...the tuning isn't enough to
>>explain that brilliant performances.
>>I tend to agree with Uri.
>Wouldn't you have thought the same thing about Fruit if you had never seen the

I think that fruit also has a lot of knowledge inside of it relative to weaker

Weaker programs may have bigger evaluation but bigger evaluation is not chess


This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.