Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:46:22 01/03/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2006 at 06:30:51, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On January 02, 2006 at 18:29:31, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On January 02, 2006 at 15:11:08, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>In my eyes what rybka doing is very basic. Like fruit's eval + simple kingsafety >>>+ very little more than that, but real well tuned. >>> >>>In my definition that is not much. That's real simple stuff. >> >> >>I don't think it is so simple...I strongly suspect that Rybka has a special >>evaluation fuction with a _lot_ of knowledge inside...the tuning isn't enough to >>explain that brilliant performances. >>I tend to agree with Uri. > >Wouldn't you have thought the same thing about Fruit if you had never seen the >source? > >-- >GCP I think that fruit also has a lot of knowledge inside of it relative to weaker programs. Weaker programs may have bigger evaluation but bigger evaluation is not chess knowledge. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.