Author: vladan
Date: 06:35:11 02/17/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2006 at 03:06:57, Robert Allgeuer wrote: >On February 16, 2006 at 21:30:22, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On February 16, 2006 at 20:47:25, vladan wrote: >> >>>Of course, as he said, he used ideas, maybe some source portions or solutions >>>from Fruit, but it is irrelevant if he added (and that is the case) his original >>>code somewhere, which amplifies playing strings for a major margin. It is not >>>cloning. If it is, all of us are monkey clones (with 95% same DNK with our >>>primate relatives :) > >If some Fruit or other source code portions were indeed used, it may not be >cloning, but it would be still a copyright infringement. However, I do not >understand at all, why - whenever there is a new strong closed-source engine >around - suspicions are voiced that this engine were not fully original, >specifically when there is zero evidence. > >Robert I don't know the law that could protect copyright rights of the free and open source program !
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.