Author: José Carlos
Date: 08:55:52 05/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 05, 1999 at 13:47:07, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: >On May 05, 1999 at 13:26:43, jose hernandez wrote: > >> >> >>For example Are a knowledge program like Rebel or Hiarcs better in blitz games >>than a Fastest programs like Fritz or Junior ? >> >>or a Knowledge program is better in long controls than a fastest programs ? >> >>What do you think? > > I think that a program can have lots of knowledge and be a fast searcher. It >seems obvious that a program can lack knowledge and be a slow searcher too. Hey, that's my program!!. So what do you call my program little-knowledge-based or slow-searcher? :) > I do not see a clear distinction between 'fast' and 'knowledge', to me those >terms are not conflictive with each other. In fact, I think that speed gives >knowledge and knowledge gives speed, in some sense. > The longer the time control, the better search algorithm will prevail. I do not >think it has to do with speed or knowledge. The fact is that the AI definition for a knowledge-based program (in general, not particularly chess) is quite different from the definitions (yes, in plural) most people is using here. I think it's not important at the moment what is the AI definition, but the most important is what any who wants to take part in this discussion wants to say when he speak of knowledge-based program. Perhaps, if people start their post with something similar to a personal definition of the terms, we all could understand better what he wants to say. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.