Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To Mel: you misquoted Dr. Hyatt.

Author: Melvin S. Schwartz

Date: 10:51:47 06/02/99

Go up one level in this thread



On June 01, 1999 at 14:02:10, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On June 01, 1999 at 13:40:26, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote:
>[snip]
>>Hello Dann!
>>
>>I probably should just set-up Hiarcs, Fritz, or Rebel and take away their Queen
>>before the first move and have some fun instead of prolonging this topic;
>>however, I am a person who when having strong opinions feels he must express
>>them even when he knows nothing about what he's talking. :-)
>There is nothing wrong with feeling passionate about things.  It is just that
>you may not necessarily be correct, despite the strong feelings.
>
>>If the SSDF could test all the programs against each other on the identical
>>computer, don't you think they would consider that a more accurate way to get
>>ratings than what they are doing now?
>They would be less accurate, and possibly useless.  For instance, if I get two
>1GHz CPU and put Hiarcs7.32 and Fritz 5.32 on them and let them rage against
>each other, believe it or not, I will have no mathematical results at all from
>the contest!  That is because neither one of them has a measured strength. The
>objective of the SSDF is to provide a true ability rating that is mathematically
>sound. While there are always great difficulties associated with a thing like
>this and there are going to be problems, it is essential that the tests
>conducted be performed with opponents of known strength.  The better and more
>accurately you know the strength of an opponent, the better and more accurately
>you will know the strength of the new configuration.  The way to determine the
>strenght of an opponent (human or computer) is a mathematical formula that uses
>the strength of the opponent as one of its arguments.  If this number is "iffy"
>(+/- one standard deviation is a large number) then the quality of the
>mathematical answer to that equation is also bad.  Therefore, the more tests you
>have with a particular system and program combination, the more valuable it
>becomes for determining the strength of the opponents.
>
>Does it become more clear now?

Well, if I am wrong, than blame the people responsible for writing in both the
manuals for Hiarcs 7 and Fritz 5.32 that the programs strength would be better
by running them on a faster pc!

Mel



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.