Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Dave Gomboc was right about the position

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 13:49:47 06/21/99

Go up one level in this thread


I fixed the (non-historical :) spelling error in the subject line.  No worries.

On June 21, 1999 at 14:02:36, Dann Corbit wrote:

>I have gone over all the pathways calculated in C.A.P. for the position in
>question (the one I thought was a blunder at first blush).  It turns out that by
>examining the results at subsequent plies you can find better alternatives.

This was the position in the Evans Gambit after 7...dxc3 is played?
Can you provide the updated CAP analysis in that line?  (But please in some
order I can follow instead of jumping around from position to position? :-)

>This points to (I think) the necessity of doing the "connect the dots"

Alternatively, you could call it minimaxing.  Yes, it's important.  This is why
I'd like programs to have 2 spots for assessments: the first holds a raw,
computed score, and the second is used for minimaxing backup (backsolving in
Bookup terminology.)  That way, when you see a position with highly different
values you can explore deeper into the continuation and see if a good move
wasn't analyzed later.

>experiment.  It also has generated a fascinating hypothesis of mine, which is
>"The Chess Analysis Project will reinvent all the great chess openings by post
>processing."

If it does not come up with "normal" variations, it indicates that the computer
assessment differs greatly from the human assessment.  Given that the human
assessment is based on a ton of experience, if a clear tactical bust isn't
present, human experience is more likely to be correct than the machine
analysis.  You can use these differing positions to tune your position
evaluation.

>And a corollary:
>"The Chess Analysis Project will invent new openings superior to any in
>existance."

Hmm, possibly new variations.  Entire new openings would be surprising.  Anyway,
if they are "superior to any in existance", they will immediately become
obsolete, because people playing the other colour will avoid them. ;)

Dave



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.