Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 06:22:22 06/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 1999 at 19:49:36, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >On June 21, 1999 at 11:16:01, Tomas Casanovas Martinez wrote: > >>Having adapted the hash tables to the recommended level of each program, I have >>continued and finished the intensive Hiarcs 7.32 test.(40 moves/2 hours). >> >>Hiarcs 7.32- Fritz 5.32 +5 -0 =3 6,5-1,5 >> >>Hiarcs 7.32- Junior 5 +8 -3 =4 10,0-5,0 >> >>Hiarcs 7.32- Crafty 16.6 +15 -3 =2 16,5-3,5 >> >>This very high performance of Hiarcs 7.32, together with other tests run by >>other people here, makes me think that probably Hiarcs 7.32 will be closer to >>2.650 than to 2.625, making very strange its poor performance in Padeborn. >> >>Tomas. >> >>..by the way, the results obtained by Hiarcs 7.32 after adapting the hash-tables >>have been better than beforehand!. > >It would be of some help if you would also post what opening books are used for >each program; for example, you should't be using Hiarcs opening book for Fritz >and vice versa. Also, there are two opening books for Fritz - general ctg, and >F5 book ctg. The latter is especially suited to Fritz's playing style from what >I've been able to ascertain. It would also be important to know what hash-table >settings you used for Hiarcs and Fritz. Also relevant to hash-tables is the >speed of your processor - which should also be noted here. The formula for >hash-tables is the same for both Hiarcs and Fritz: >2 x processor speed x seconds per move = HT. Example: 40/2 on a 400MHz processor >would require 144 megs for optimum use according to the manual, program, and >other informed sources. > >Mel Hello! I have sent you a mail but it bounced back. Is their anything wrong with the address. Bertil SSDF
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.