Author: Chris Carson
Date: 06:23:23 06/23/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 23, 1999 at 08:44:44, Torstein Hall wrote: >On June 22, 1999 at 03:05:32, blass uri wrote: > >><snipped> >>>>I think that computers help humans to do tactical blunders. >>>>I think that sokolov was surprised by good moves of Fritz in the opening. >>>> >>>>I think that Fritz had advantage and a good chance to win even without the >>>>blunder of sokolov. >>> >>> >>> >>>Then I don't understand... as when DB ripped Kasparov in game 6, Kasparov >>>played poorly and the computer was lucky. Here the GM was OK and Fritz played >>>great? While still in book? The two circumstances seem similar. In _both_ >>>games the human blundered in the opening and lost quickly... >> >>In the game of kasparov the human blundered in a known position from theory. >>In this case I understand that Fritz played a novelty Bh6. >> >>In the game of kasparov computers evaluate the position after Nxe6 of deeper >>blue as better for black when in this case I found that the evaluation of >>computers show advantage for white. >> >>I think that the kind of position that Fritz came out of the opening is better >>for computers and probably Fritz could practically win another GM from the >>position after Bh6 >> >>I think that the practical mistake of the sokolov was that it chose a bad >>opening. >>Instead of playing Nxe4 going to open spanish it was better to play for close >>positions with Be7. >> >>Uri > >According to GM Einar Gausel, its a popular move against computers as its >usually leads to endgame positions quite early, after a lot of excahnges in the >opening. > >Torstein Hall Good advice. Best Regards, Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.