Author: blass uri
Date: 09:20:46 06/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 1999 at 10:23:28, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >On June 24, 1999 at 04:19:15, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On June 23, 1999 at 21:48:00, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>> >>>On June 23, 1999 at 14:49:54, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>> >>>>if a program only evaluates draw over draw-score, and loses (like fritz in paris >>>>against ferret e.g.) what is the realistic part of the score ?? >>>>Ferret was 0.43 up and fritz was 0.00 ! What was realistic of this evaluation? >>>>What was fritz evaluating ? Its chances to win the championship? >>> >>>Ferret didn't play Fritz in Paris, except in the blitz, and its eval window was >>>closed during that game. So perhaps you mean Paderborn? >>> >>>bruce >> >>Yeah ! Ferret was playing Fritz in Paderborn. And was 0.43 up. >>And later it was 1.30 up etc. >>and fritz' evaluation was horrible. >>But in Paris Fritz had similar draw-scores. >>This was my point. Because i have these strange scores at home too. > >Ferret has a huge speculative penalty for having the king and the rook screwed >up like that. The reason is that I got sick of losing games where its king and >rook got srewed up like that. > >The score bottomed out at +0.29 or something, right after c3. Everyone was >saying my program was dead, for quite a long time, and perhaps they were right. I do not think that they were right. I suggest you to ask the people that say that your program was dead to play against it from the position after c3 I want to know if they can change this score to be nagative in some moves. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.