Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 02:47:13 07/07/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 1999 at 00:47:30, Ed Schröder wrote: >On July 06, 1999 at 18:33:40, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>On July 06, 1999 at 18:22:07, John Wentworth wrote: >> >>>It would be interesting to know if programs that have been "learning" over the >>>past few years, if they could compete with programs that have not "learned" >>>anything yet. For example, MChess 5.0 which came out several years ago was >>>supposedly able to learn, if someone has been continually using it and it has >>>been learning, could it compete with a program like Hiarcs 7.32 or Fritz 5.x ? >> >>Hello! >> >>No! >> >>But it don´t loose the same game twice. This is the case with programs with no >>learning, especially Rebel that often play the same variation over and over >>again. Rebel has some primitive book-learning but it don´t work in narrow lines, >>where there isn't any allowed alternatives. Mchess have a good learner but it's >>not easy to save a game from a rotten opening-line, which is the problem in many >>cases. > >That is because it is proven you have tested Rebel WITHOUT the learner. >There is nothing wrong with Rebel's learner. There was something wrong >with your testing. > >Ed Schroder > >Hello! What kind of learner is that? Rebel saves the games including the result i.e. 0-1. Other programs is aware of the result if the game is SAVED including the game-score. In 99% of the cases the game is saved including the correct result. Regards Bertil SSDF >>Regards Bertil SSDF
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.