Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New FIDE World Champion ...

Author: KarinsDad

Date: 06:18:28 08/19/99

Go up one level in this thread


On August 19, 1999 at 05:58:50, James Robertson wrote:

>On August 19, 1999 at 01:22:52, KarinsDad wrote:
>
>>On August 18, 1999 at 23:52:54, James Robertson wrote:
>>
>>>On August 18, 1999 at 20:15:43, Mark Ryan wrote:
>>>
>>>>... will be rated 2646 or less.  Under the current FIDE World Championship
>>>>tournament format, maybe a chess program would have a genuine shot !
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Mark
>>>
>>>My personal opinion, but this KO thing SUCKS. It will be very amusing to have
>>>FIDE forced to declare a player not even in the top 40 the best in the world. I
>>>think it serves them right! :)
>>>
>>>James
>>
>>What's your point? They played the games. The winners won, the losers lost.
>>
>>A true champion would have risen to the top, regardless of competition.
>>
>>You are too hung up on the "big names" and slightly higher ratings and forget
>>that these guys are ALL championship caliber players.
>>
>>Who cares who wins?
>>
>>Whomever does had to go through 6 or 7 Rounds of tough competition.
>>
>>KarinsDad :)
>
>My point is: I think 2 games followed by blitz games is too random to decide who
>would have gone to the top. Look at Shirov; I believe that if he had played 4 or
>6 games with Nisipeanu he could have recovered from his 2nd round loss.
>
>Also, playing straight for almost 30 days is tremendously difficult. We have
>watched a big decline in playing strength....
>
>There is a good chance Nisipeanu will win this thing, and be declared best in
>the world. I think a strong case can be made that he is not even the best player
>in the field, so there must be something wrong with the way this WC thing is set
>up. :)
>
>One last thing; I am curious, what do you mean by "true champion"? :)
>
>James

Fischer, Kasparov. Someone who would have played for a win in every game in such
a short format and wiped his opponents as opposed to these players who say
"Well, I have black first round. So, I will play for a draw and attempt to win
in round two. And if that fails, I may still be able to get into tiebreaks.".

Bogus. Anyone who draws after 16 moves is not a true champion. For example,
Adams game 2 round 6 after already being down 0-1. Kasparov would have fought
tooth and nail for a win in round 2 and never would have OFFERED a draw.

KarinsDad :)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.