Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:45:23 11/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 30, 1999 at 04:40:20, Ed Schröder wrote: >On November 30, 1999 at 04:12:22, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>On November 30, 1999 at 03:35:54, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>As said we must have a different view on king safety even on the basics as >>>this case for me is so crystal clear: QRRB all pointed at a naked king, the >>>king having hardly any escapes, >> >>True, but all it takes to wreck the whole thing is ONE escape for the black >>king, as long as black doesn't lose material doing it. In this case, I don't >>think there is an escape, but it will happen in other positions. > >And SEARCH will filter that. > >Ed not at 1-2-3 plies it won't. If you don't see the escape, you make the sac. If I don't see the win, I don't make it. That is a subtle difference. You want the search to refute the positional sac. I want the search to justify the sac... > >>>the black pieces not able to defend its >>>own king. Based on that Rebel gives a 2 pawn positional bonus after >>>2.Qxh6 and even more after 3.Bxf5.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.