Author: Andrew Williams
Date: 08:17:30 12/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 1999 at 09:13:48, Dusan Dobes wrote: >On December 03, 1999 at 08:49:19, Andrew Williams wrote: > >>Over the last few days, I have been fascinated by the discussions on CCC >>about positional sacrifices. Some of the discussion has centred on the value >>assigned to the attack that is obtained after the sacrifice and I was wondering >>how other programs evaluated the position after Hossa's sac: >> >>r3q1k1/ppp1rp2/2n1b2Q/8/2P5/3B4/PPP2RPP/5RK1 b - - 0 2 >> >>This is after 1. Bxh6 gxh6 2. Qxh6 from the original position posted by >>Peter McKenzie. PostModernist's static evaluation of the position is presented >>below. Essentially, it thinks that White is winning by 0.71. The ATTACKTOTAL >>score is generated by analyzing the squares around the King to see how many of >>them are attacked and what sorts of pieces are attacking them. Please note that >>not all the factors that contribute to PM's score are included in the output >>below. >> >>Could other programmers post similar information? I believe that even an >>overall static evaluation would be interesting. >> >>Cheers >> >>Andrew Williams > >Phalanx XXI static evaluation scores this position as +3.05 for white. >Material gives -1.5, black king safety +5.76. > >Dusan Dobes That seems extraordinarily high. Might this not cause Phalanx to sac a whole Rook to reach this position? Thanks for your response. Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.